Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 May;13(5):445–454. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1174572

Table 1.

Reviewed studies of efficacy of BCI in stroke rehabilitation.

Study Stroke chonicity N (sex) System and regimen Did therapy result in noted improvements? Are BCI therapy results statistically significant at exit? Outcomes and behavioral outcome measures of interest
Ang et al. (2015) Chronic N = 19 10 sessions of tDCS or sham before 1 h of MI-BCI with robotic feedback for 2 weeks (sham-controlled, RCT) No No UE FMMA
Ang et al. (2014) Chronic N = 21
M = 14
F = 7
3-arm RCT; MI-BCI with HK, HK, and standard therapy; 18 sessions of 1 h interventions Yes, BCI-HK group Yes, BCI-HK group FMMA
Biasiucci et al. (2013) Chronic N = 4 At least 10 sessions of FES controlled by BCI over a period of 2 months Yes N/A FMA
Broetz et al. (2010) Chronic N = 1
M = 1
F = 0
1 h physiotherapy with each BCI session Yes No FMA, Wolf motor function test, modified Ashworth scale
Buch et al. (2008) Chronic N = 8 13–22 sessions MEG-BCI with hand orthosis over 3–8 weeks Yes No In-house measure of success (>50% target ‘hit’)
Bundy et al. (2012) Chronic N = 4 Subjects performed between 85 and 246 control trials of BCI Yes Yes ARAT
Caria et al. (2011) Chronic N = 1
M = 1
F = 0
After 2–4 weeks MEG-BCI, case study had EEG-BCI and 4-week periods of EEG-BCI 3 & 9 months later. 1 h physiotherapy w/each BCI session Yes Yes FMA; Wolf motor function test; modified Ashworth scale, and goal attainment score
Daly et al. (2009) Chronic N = 1
M = 0
F = 1
Nine 45-min BCI-FES sessions over 3 weeks. Also weekly 1.6 h of non-BCI FES therapy Yes Yes Isolated movement index finger extension
Liu et al. (2012) Sub acute and chronic N = 314 12–20 weekly or twice-weekly 1 h sessions using EEG-BCI triggering a hand orthosis for finger extension over 4–7 months Yes Yes, significance was found in FMA and ARAT, but no significance indicated in MAL FMA, ARAT, and MAL-14
Mihara et al. (2013) Chronic N = 20 6 sessions of NIRS-guided BCI with mental practice with MI + standard rehabilitation Yes Yes FMA and ARAT
Murlidharan et al. (2011) Chronic N = 4 1 session a week for 4 weeks of BCI Yes Yes FMA
Ono et al. (2014) Chronic N = 12 Visual feedback and somatosensory feedback groups. Each group received 12–20 sessions of 1 h length Yes, motor improvements in somatosensory group N/A SIAS for finger function
Prasad et al. (2010) Chronic N = 5
M = 4
F = 1
2 treatment sessions each week of BCI-MI + PP for a total of 6 week Yes Yes Motricity index ARAT, 9-Hole Peg Test grip strength; fatigue and mood and qualitative feedback
Ramos-Murguialday et al. (2013) Chronic N = 32 17.8 ± 1.4 days of training with BCI with an orthotic Yes Yes FMA
Rayegani et al. (2013) N/A N = 30 10 sessions of conventional OT, in addition to either EMG-biofeedback therapy or neurofeedback therapy Yes Voluntary contraction of abductor pollicis brevis increased significantly after EMG-biofeedback therapy Jebsen hand function test
Shin do et al. (2011) Chronic N = 8
M = 8
F = 0
12–20 weekly or twice-weekly 1 h sessions over 4–7 months using EEG-BCI triggering a hand orthosis for finger extension Yes Yes SIAS; MAL amount of use; modified Ashworth scale; resting motor threshold
Young et al. (2014) Chronic N = 11
M = 8
F = 3
At least nine- and up to fifteen 2-h sessions of interventional BCI + FES + TS Yes Yes Stroke impact scale; ARAT; 9-Hole Peg test; laterality index

N: Number; tDCS: transcranial direct current stimulation; MI: motor imagery; BCI: brain–computer interface; RCT: randomized control trial; UE: upper extremity; FMMA: Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment; M: male; F: female; HK: Haptic-Knob robotic arm; FES: functional electrical stimulation; MEG: magnetoencephalograms; EEG: electroencephalogram; FMA Fugl-Meyer Assessment; ARAT: Action Research Arm Test; MAL: Motor Activity Log; NIRS: near-infrared spectroscopy; SIAS: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set; PP: physiotherapy; EMG: electromyography; TS: tongue stimulation.