Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;12(12):e1004914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004914

Fig 6. Differences in phase synchrony between the mTBI and Controls in the PLS analysis.

Fig 6

Panel (A) illustrates the contrast between two groups. Expression of this contrast is shown in (B) as the distribution of all the bootstrap ratio values for phase-locking value between each pair of regional neuromagnetic sources at all frequencies. The distribution of these effects across frequencies, related to a decrease (C) and increase (D) in phase synchrony in mTBI participants relative to controls is plotted as the number of connections whose bootstrap ratio values belong to the corresponding 1% tails. The mTBI participants expressed reduced connectivity in the δ and γ band and hyperconnectivity at α frequencies.