Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167334

Table 2. Summary Table of Findings.

Quality assessment No of patients Effects Quality
No of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Association RR 95% CI
CKD stage 3 (predicted with: uNGAL)
3 observational studies serious not serious not serious not serious none 24748 1.06 0.96~1.18 VERY LOW
CKD stage 3 (predicted with: uKIM-1)
3 observational studies serious not serious not serious not serious weak 24748 1.13 1~1.27 VERY LOW
ESRD (predicted with: uNGAL)
4 observational studies serious not serious not serious not serious strong 19911 1.40 1.21~1.61 MEDIUM
ESRD (predicted with: uKIM-1)
3 observational studies serious not serious not serious not serious none 16402 1.13 0.96~1.33 VERY LOW
ESRD (predicted with: uNAG)
3 observational studies serious not serious not serious not serious none 16201 1.10 0.93~1.31 VERY LOW
Mortality (predicted with: uNGAL)
3 observational studies serious serious not serious not serious weak 4119 1.10 1.03~1.18 VERY LOW

Notes: No, number; RR, relative risk; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval