Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016 Nov 14;24(1):41–52. doi: 10.1530/ERC-16-0402

Table 2.

Hazard ratios of BRAF V600E/RAS or TERT promoter mutations each alone or their coexistence for the recurrence of PTC

Mutations Recurrence Recurrence per 1,000 Person-Years (95% CI) Unadjusted
Hazard Ratios (95% CI)
Adjustment 1
Hazard Ratios (95% CI)
Adjustment 2
Hazard Ratios (95% CI)
Adjustment 3
Hazard Ratios (95% CI)
BRAF No mutation 6/87 (6.9) 22.15 (9.94–49.25) 1
BRAFV600E mutation only 22/154 (14.3) 35.5 (23.14–54.44) 1.88 (0.76–4.63) 1.84 (0.74–4.56) 1.36 (0.5–3.7) 1.34 (0.43–4.17)
TERT mutation only 1/5 (20) 154.27 (21.73–1095.16) 5.82 (0.64–52.64) 6.24 (0.65–60.10) 0.90 (0.05–15.55) 25.30 (0.52–1241)
BRAFV600E+TERT mutations 7/19 (36.8) 106.94 (50.98–224.31) 4.75 (1.58–14.29) 6.59 (1.55–27.94) 5.46 (0.71–41.97) 71.36 (1.11–4560)

RAS No mutation 6/87 (6.9) 22.15 (9.94–49.25) 1
RAS mutation only 3/34 (8.8) 31.62 (10.20–98.03) 1.51 (0.36–6.34) 1.44 (0.34–6.06) 0.65 (0.11–3.77) 0.35 (0.04–2.82)
TERT mutation only 1/5 (20) 154.27 (21.73–1095.16) 5.82 (0.64–52.64) 6.24 (0.65–60.10) 0.9 (0.05–15.55) 25.30 (0.52–1241)
RAS+TERT mutations 6/6 (100) 1173 (526.99–2610.97) 39.04 (10.56–144.3) 106.76 (15.30–744.49) 89.88 (8.89–909.14) 138.0 (5.75–3313)

BRAF/RAS No mutation 6/87 (6.9) 22.15 (9.94–49.25) 1
BRAF V600E/RAS mutation only 25/189 (13.2) 34.86 (23.36–52.01) 1.77 (0.72–4.31) 1.74 (0.71–4.24) 1.3 (0.48–3.5) 1.24 (0.42–3.66)
TERT mutation only 1/5 (20) 154.27 (21.73–1095.16) 5.82 (0.64–52.64) 6.24 (0.65–60.10) 0.90 (0.05–15.55) 25.30 (0.52–1241)
BRAF V600E/RAS+TERT mutations 13/25 (52) 184.2 (106.96–317.28) 8.17 (3.09–21.58) 12.44 (3.33–46.56) 13.16 (2.39–72.42) 14.71 (2.79–77.61)

The “BRAF” group excluded patients with RAS mutations, the “RAS” group excluded patients with BRAF mutation, and the “BRAF/RAS” group included all the patients regardless of the BRAF and RAS mutation status. Hazard ratio and 95% CI were calculated using Cox regression for the comparison of the indicated mutation group with the group harboring neither mutation. Adjustment 1 was made for patient age at diagnosis and sex. Adjustment 2 was made for patient age at diagnosis, sex, multifocality, tumor size, extrathyroidal invasion and lymph node metastasis. Adjustment 3 was made for patient age at diagnosis, sex, multifocality, tumor size, extrathyroidal invasion, lymph node metastasis and medical center.