Table 1.
No use (n=438) | Moderate use (1 or 2 days, n=225) | High use (>2days, n=92) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | N | % | N | % | N | % | Test statistic | DF |
Sociodemographic | ||||||||
Age (M ± SD) | 45.7 ± 8.6 | 45.4 ± 8.7 | 44.6 ±9.4 | F = .6 | 2,752 | |||
Male gender | 345 | 79 | 160 | 71 | 67 | 73 | χ2 = 5.2 | 2 |
Race | χ2 = 7.1 | 6 | ||||||
White | 151 | 35 | 95 | 42 | 37 | 41 | ||
Black | 222 | 51 | 103 | 46 | 41 | 46 | ||
Hispanic | 37 | 9 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 9 | ||
Other races | 24 | 6 | 15 | 6.7 | 4 | 4 | ||
Location | χ2 = 52.7 *** | 20 | ||||||
Chattanooga | 23 | 5 | 21 | 9 | 9 | 10 | ||
Chicago | 41 | 9 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 4 | ||
Columbus | 54 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 7 | 8 | ||
Denver | 55 | 13 | 35 | 16 | 7 | 8 | ||
Ft. Lauderdale | 37 | 8 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 3 | b | |
Los Angeles | 50 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | ||
Martinez | 31 | 7 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
NYC | 39 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | b | |
Philadelphia | 31 | 7 | 24 | 11 | 14 | 15 | ||
Portland | 33 | 8 | 25 | 11 | 14 | 15 | ||
San Francisco | 44 | 10 | 36 | 16 | 17 | 19 | ||
Never married | 207 | 47 | 104 | 46 | 46 | 50 | ||
Employment/Financial | ||||||||
Employedd | 83 | 19 | 34 | 15 | 6 | 7 | χ2 = 8.9*b | 2 |
Disability/Public support incomed (M ± SD) | 311.0 ± 320 | 300.9 ± 305.6 | 417.4 ± 326.7 | F = 4.9 **ab | 2, 752 | |||
Legal | ||||||||
Convicted of felonye | 189 | 43 | 87 | 39 | 46 | 50 | χ2 = 3.6 | 2 |
Housing | ||||||||
Days homelessf (M ± SD) | 56.2 ± 38.2 | 56.2 ± 35.8 | 53.5 ± 34.7 | F = .2 | 2, 752 | |||
Number of places livedf (M ± SD) | 1.9 ± 1.2 | 2.4 ± 1.7 | 2.6 ± 1.6 | F = 15.0***ab | 2,752 |
p<.05,
p<.01,
p<.001
Difference between no use and high use significant (P<.05)
Difference between no use and moderate use significant (P<.05)
Difference between moderate and high use significant (P<.05)
Past 30 days
Lifetime
Past 90 days