Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Oct 21;40(12):2648–2655. doi: 10.1111/acer.13240

Table 2.

Comparison of matched and non-matched samples (restricted to underage drinkers).

Prior to Propensity Score
Matching
After Matching


No Fake ID Fake ID p No Fake ID Fake ID % bias
reduction
Cross-sectional Sample N=1454 (583 of which had fake IDs) N=817 (359 of which had fake IDs)

Age 18.95 19.06 .007 19.06 19.14 8.0%
Age of Alcohol Use Onset 16.26 15.38 <.001 15.13 15.35 78.6%*
Employed .22 .24 .321 .20 .24 NA
Exposure to Substance Use 3.68 4.22 <.001 4.28 4.25 94.7%
Family Income 4.90 5.91 <.001 5.87 5.87 99.2%
Gender (1=Male) .42 .50 .002 .52 .49 75.6%
GPA 3.00 3.02 .466 3.11 3.05 NA
Greek membership .09 .35 <.001 .33 .38 81.3%*
Health (self-assessed) 3.33 3.44 .001 3.50 3.44 52.3%
Low Self-Control 2.13 2.24 <.001 2.25 2.24 86.0%
Peer Substance Use 2.42 2.90 <.001 2.94 2.93 98.2%
Race (1=Nonwhite) .43 .11 <.001 .12 .10 94.9%
Rural Home Location .34 .38 .114 .47 .38 NA*
Sexual Orientation (1=LGBT) .03 .03 .869 .01 .03 NA
Subjective Distress 3.07 3.05 .608 3.06 3.06 NA

Longitudinal Sample N=2392 (510 of which had fake IDs) N=518 (244 of which had fake IDs)

Age 18.31 18.34 .340 18.34 18.34 NA
Age of Alcohol Use Onset 11.60 13.77 <.001 13.94 13.95 99.8%
Employed .41 .31 <.001 .29 .33 36.3%
Exposure to Substance Use .14 .16 .494 .11 .15 NA
Socioeconomic Status .30 .25 .039 .27 .27 90.5%
Gender (1=Male) .38 .37 .569 .32 .29 NA
GPA 3.10 2.95 <.001 3.04 3.08 63.8%
Greek membership .21 .56 <.001 .56 .55 97.0%
Health (self-assessed) 3.91 4.04 .001 4.04 4.04 98.4%
Low Self-Control 17.34 16.70 .062 15.48 15.66 NA
Peer Substance Use 2.54 3.72 <.001 3.69 3.65 96.2%
Race (1=Nonwhite) .11 .06 <.001 .07 .06 81.7%
Sexual Orientation (1=LGBT) .06 .05 .657 .02 .03 NA
Subjective Distress .53 .56 .481 .55 .56 NA

Note: values listed are means of the groups prior to and following matching. Significant p values in the non-matched sample indicate those with and those without fake identification were different prior to matching. The percent reduction in bias is listed in the final column for each of the factors that were previously significantly different.

An * in the final column denotes the factors that remain significantly different between the groups even after matching.