Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):536–546. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1080-z

Table 2.

Average AIC and BIC values for each model as a function of the condition in Experiment 1 (upper) and Experiment 2 (lower)

AIC BIC
Experiment 1
Gains EF 197.56 (77.70) 211.65 (77.70)
Basic RL 205.62 (77.00) 216.19 (77.00)
ET 200.04 (78.50) 214.12 (78.50)
Baseline 259.23 (89.87) 262.75 (89.87)
Losses EF 216.73 (97.89) 230.82 (97.89)
Basic RL 236.02 (88.28) 246.59 (88.28)
ET 217.51 (90.70) 231.60 (90.70)
Baseline 301.26 (54.50) 304.79 (54.50)
Experiment 2
Gains EF 111.82 (64.95) 125.91 (64.95)
Basic RL 121.40 (69.14) 131.96 (69.14)
ET 117.06 (68.31) 131.14 (68.31)
Baseline 148.09 (84.53) 151.61 (84.53)
Losses EF 219.34 (50.00) 233.43 (50.00)
Basic RL 232.91 (48.80) 243.47 (48.80)
ET 229.60 (48.71) 243.68 (48.71)
Baseline 292.93 (54.70) 296.45 (54.70)

Standard deviations are given in parentheses. Values in bold are the minimum AIC or BIC values among these models