Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 2;6:38143. doi: 10.1038/srep38143

Table 1. Participant baseline characteristics demonstrating that there were no significant differences in patient demographics between the treatment and historical control groups.

Characteristics Treatment (n = 109 eyes) (%) Control (n = 79 eyes) (%) P value
Age (years): Mean ± SD (Range) 45.4 ± 19.3(16–82) 53.7 ± 14.1(26–81) 0.13
 ≤40 years 18 (16.5) 7 (8.9)  
 >40 years 91 (83.5) 72 (91.1)  
Sex:     0.26
 Male 63 (57.8) 36 (45.6) 0.47
 Female 46 (42.2) 43 (54.4) 0.2
Diagnosis     0.39
  -Chemical/thermal injuries 29 (26.6) 18 (22.8)  
  -Neurotrophic keratopathy 25 (22.9) 30 (38.0)  
  -Postinfectious persistent epithelial defects 15 (13.8) 9 (11.4)  
  -Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis 11 (10.1) 4 (5.1)  
  -Bullous keratopathy 6 (5.5) 3 (3.8)  
  -Contact lens-related limbal stem cell deficiency 6 (5.5) 2 (2.5)  
  -Recurrent corneal erosion 5 (4.6) 3 (3.8)  
  -Vernal keratoconjunctivitis with shield ulcer 4 (3.7) 2 (2.5)  
  -Mucous membrane pemphigoid 3 (2.6) 1 (1.3)  
  -Exposure keratopathy 3 (2.6) 1 (1.3)  
  -Graft-versus-host disease 1 (0.9) 1 (1.3)  
  -Unknown cause limbal stem cell deficiency 1 (0.9)  
  -Severe dry eye 4 (5.1)  
  -Aniridia keratopathy 1 (1.3)  
Diabetes mellitus 34 (31.2) 21 (26.6) 0.47
Prior contact lens use 73 (67.0) 45 (57.0) 0.020

n = number, SD = standard deviation.