Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 24;51(6):2115–2139. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12595

Table 2.

Outcomes during Phase II and Comparison to Phase I Outcomes

Outcome Phase II Outcomes Phase I Outcomesb (n = 322) Difference in Outcomes for Phase II (Primary Sample) and Phase Ic
Primary Sample–Beneficiaries Enrolled During Phase II (n = 483) Secondary Sample–Beneficiaries Enrolled During Phase II and Phase I High‐risk Enrollees Who Remained Enrolled During Phase II (n = 736) Primary Sample After Weightinga (n = 483)
Annualized hospitalizations, number per person per year
Control group mean 0.743 0.723 0.524 0.872 −0.129
Regression‐adjusted treatment–control difference (90% confidence interval) 0.065 (−0.086, 0.216) 0.039 (−0.080, 0.157) 0.106 (−0.025, 0.237) −0.293*** (−0.458, −0.129) 0.359*** (0.136, 0.581)
Annualized outpatient emergency department visits, number per person per year
Control group mean 0.747 0.729 0.655 NA NA
Regression‐adjusted treatment–control difference (90% confidence interval) 0.010 (−0.135, 0.156) −0.059 (−0.174, 0.056) −0.017 (−0.145, 0.111) NA NA
Medicare Part A and B expenditures, dollars per beneficiary per month
Without program fees
Control group mean 1,748 1,694 1,284 1,415 333
Regression‐adjusted treatment–control difference (90% confidence interval) 16 (−315, 347) 29 (−218, 277) 118 (−151, 386) −425** (−698, −152) 441* (13, 689)
With program fees
Regression‐adjusted treatment–control difference (90% confidence interval) 276 (−55, 607) 264* (17, 512) 380** (112, 648) −313* (−587, −40) 589** (161, 1,017)
Mean program fees paid for beneficiaries in treatment group, dollars per beneficiary per month $260 $235 $262 $112 $148
Died within 2 years of enrollmentd, %
Control group mean, % 15.5 NA NA 13.8 1.7
Regression‐adjusted odds ratio (90% confidence interval) 0.88 (0.49–1.59) NA NA 0.33 (0.13–0.81)** 0.55e
Mean number of follow‐up months (treatment and control) 25.5 30.8 24.5 49.4 −23.9

Sample sizes are treatment and control groups combined. The control group mean is weighted but not regression‐adjusted.

*p < .10, **p < .05, ***p < .01.

a

The Phase II enrollees are weighted to resemble the Phase I enrollees on baseline characteristics.

b

The results from Phase I come from Burwell (2014), who used high‐risk enrollees through June 2009. The sample size (n = 322) differs from the sample size in Table 1 (n = 366), which includes beneficiaries who enrolled through March 2010.

c

The p‐values are for tests of the null hypothesis that the impact estimates in the two phases are the same.

d

The sample is limited to beneficiaries who enrolled early enough to be followed up for 2 years before the end of the period (n = 369 for the primary sample for Phase II and n = 248 for Phase I).

e

p = .13 for the test that the odds ratios in the two phases are the same.

NA, not available.