Table 4.
Phenotypic variance explained (h2) in 2287 validation animals for protein yield (PY), somatic cell score (SCS) and interval first –last insemination (IFL)
Trait | Selection criteria | ISQ | HD | 50k | ISQ | HD | 50k | ISQ | HD | 50k |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected set of variants (GRM) |
Complementary set of variants (GRMc) | Sum of GRM and GRMc | ||||||||
PY | All variants | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.83 | 0.98 | 0.82 | |
−log10(p) > 3 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.82 | |
−log10(p) > 5 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.83 | |
COJO3 | 0.11 | 0.70 | 0.81 | |||||||
COJO5 | 0.10 | 0.71 | 0.81 | |||||||
COJO5LD | 0.08 | 0.73 | 0.82 | |||||||
COJO#100 | 0.09 | 0.72 | 0.82 | |||||||
SCS | All variants | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.86 | |
−log10(p) > 3 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.85 | |
−log10(p) > 5 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.86 | |
COJO3 | 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.81 | |||||||
COJO5 | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.80 | |||||||
COJO5LD | 0.05 | 0.79 | 0.84 | |||||||
COJO#100 | 0.08 | 0.76 | 0.83 | |||||||
IFL | All variants | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.70 | |
−log10(p) > 3 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.51 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | |
−log10(p) > 5 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | |
COJO3 | 0.11 | 0.57 | 0.67 | |||||||
COJO5 | 0.12 | 0.57 | 0.69 | |||||||
COJO5LD | 0.07 | 0.64 | 0.71 | |||||||
COJO#100 | 0.08 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
COJO analysis with −log10(p) > 3 (COJO3) or −log10(p) > 5 (COJO5); ISQ are all imputed sequence variants, HD and 50k are the SNPs on the common HD and 50k panels
Variances are estimated fitting and together in one model where were based on the selected set of variants and on the complementary variants. Set of variants that were selected using GWAS results on 3469 discovery animals