Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 2;10:552. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00552

Table 5.

Description of the different distribution of errors among connected spots, obtained by using the nTMS-based “single spot” approach, for each language fascicle.

Fascicles Mean ± SD of connected spots (median, range) p-value
Semantic Hesitation Performance Phonological No response
AF 1.9 ± 1.28 1.80 ± 2.30 0.70 ± 1.05 0.10 ± 0.31 0.50 ± 1.70 0.01
(2, 0–4) (0.5, 0–6) (0, 0–3) (0, 0–1) (0, 0–2)
UF 1 ± 0.94 0.90 ± 1.28 0.40 ± 0.69 0.30 ± 0.48 0.60 ± 0.96 0.36
(1, 0–3) (0.5, 0–4) (0, 0–2) (0, 0–1) (0, 0–3)
IFOF 1.60 ± 1.07 0.60 ± 0.84 0.60 ± 1.35 0 0.50 ± 0.70 0.007
(2, 0–3) (0, 0–2) (0, 0–4) 0 (0, 0–2)
ILF 1.70 ± 1.16 0.50 ± 0.70 0.80 ± 1.13 0.10 ± 0.31 0.40 ± 0.69 0.001
(1.5, 0–4) (0, 0–2) (0, 0–3) (0, 0–1) (0, 0–2)