Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;16(11):1912. doi: 10.3390/s16111912

Table 8.

Performance comparison of factory and our own linear calibrations for all five tested sensors in saline conditions: average AD (vol %) and RMSE values (vol %).

Factory Linear Calibration Own Linear Calibration
Sensor Type Material Packing Salinity 1 Average AD (vol %) RMSE (vol %) Average AD (vol %) RMSE (vol %)
ECH2O TE Sand Compact 1st round 0.64 0.72 0.42 0.62
ECH2O EC-5 Sand Compact 1st round 2.81 2.90 0.92 0.95
ECH2O EC-10 Sand Compact 1st round 4.03 4.42 10.73 11.51
ECH2O EC-20 Sand Compact 1st round 4.09 4.49 12.95 13.66
ThetaProbe Sand Compact 1st round 1.32 1.63 2.00 2.03
ECH2O TE Sand Compact 2nd round 1.82 1.93 0.93 1.07
ECH2O EC-5 Sand Compact 2nd round 1.75 2.37 1.41 1.43
ECH2O EC-10 Sand Compact 2nd round 11.11 12.23 20.55 21.43
ECH2O EC-20 Sand Compact 2nd round 10.36 11.22 21.25 21.79
ThetaProbe Sand Compact 2nd round 3.79 4.31 4.65 4.79
ECH2O TE Sand Compact 3rd round 4.63 4.71 3.49 3.52
ECH2O EC-5 Sand Compact 3rd round 1.80 1.97 2.53 2.91
ECH2O EC-10 Sand Compact 3rd round 16.74 17.12 26.62 26.87
ECH2O EC-20 Sand Compact 3rd round 16.06 16.45 27.39 27.61
ThetaProbe Sand Compact 3rd round 7.58 7.64 7.70 7.71

1 Increasing salinity level due to repeated saline water application on the sand material; 1st round = the initially dry sand was wetted by saline water, then the water was evaporated (salt remained) and new wetting with saline water started = 2nd round, etc.