Table 5.
Cross-table of random effects network meta-analysis for global peer adherence network
| SOC | 1.47 (0.38, 5.93) | 1.23 (0.42, 3.57) | 0.96 (0.07, 10.01) | 1.62 (0.41, 6.30) | 0.97 (0.52, 1.81) | 0.77 (0.21, 2.86) | 0.21 (0.04, 0.98) | 0.66 (0.36, 1.09) | 0.09 (0.01, 0.54) |
| 0.68 (0.17, 2.63) | eSOC | 0.83 (0.16, 4.26) | 0.67 (0.07, 4.20) | 1.10 (0.16, 7.18) | 0.66 (0.18, 2.34) | 0.52 (0.08, 3.17) | 0.14 (0.02, 1.10) | 0.45 (0.10, 1.77) | 0.06 (0.01, 0.59) |
| 0.82 (0.28, 2.40) | 1.21 (0.24, 6.35) | CBT | 0.79 (0.05, 9.57) | 1.32 (0.34, 5.12) | 0.79 (0.27, 2.33) | 0.63 (0.12, 3.22) | 0.17 (0.02, 1.13) | 0.54 (0.15, 1.69) | 0.08 (0.01, 0.61) |
| 1.04 (0.10, 13.77) | 1.50 (0.24, 13.98) | 1.27 (0.10, 19.64) | CBT+Peer supporter | 1.68 (0.11, 30.31) | 1.00 (0.10, 12.81) | 0.80 (0.06, 13.88) | 0.21 (0.01, 4.36) | 0.68 (0.06, 9.07) | 0.10 (0.00, 2.19) |
| 0.62 (0.16, 2.42) | 0.91 (0.14, 6.22) | 0.76 (0.20, 2.93) | 0.60 (0.03, 8.73) | CBT+Treatment supporter | 0.60 (0.14, 2.51) | 0.48 (0.07, 3.09) | 0.13 (0.02, 1.01) | 0.41 (0.09, 1.67) | 0.06 (0.01, 0.53) |
| 1.03 (0.55, 1.94) | 1.52 (0.43, 5.57) | 1.26 (0.43, 3.69) | 1.00 (0.08, 9.66) | 1.67 (0.40, 6.94) | Peer supporter | 0.80 (0.21, 2.96) | 0.21 (0.04, 1.15) | 0.68 (0.28, 1.48) | 0.10 (0.01, 0.62) |
| 1.29 (0.35, 4.83) | 1.91 (0.32, 11.85) | 1.58 (0.31, 8.10) | 1.25 (0.07, 16.95) | 2.10 (0.32, 13.47) | 1.26 (0.34, 4.72) | Peer supporter+Device reminder | 0.26 (0.03, 2.03) | 0.85 (0.20, 3.36) | 0.12 (0.01, 1.10) |
| 4.87 (1.02, 23.76) | 7.15 (0.91, 58.16) | 5.93 (0.89, 40.10) | 4.67 (0.23, 78.03) | 7.87 (0.99, 62.76) | 4.73 (0.87, 25.66) | 3.78 (0.49, 29.34) | Peer supporter+Telephone | 3.22 (0.57, 16.40) | 0.45 (0.04, 4.93) |
| 1.51 (0.92, 2.79) | 2.22 (0.57, 10.28) | 1.84 (0.59, 6.46) | 1.47 (0.11, 16.75) | 2.45 (0.60, 11.20) | 1.47 (0.68, 3.53) | 1.17 (0.30, 5.08) | 0.31 (0.06, 1.75) | Treatment supporter | 0.14 (0.02, 0.93) |
| 10.69 (1.86, 74.00) | 15.88 (1.70, 168.30) | 13.21 (1.65, 117.10) | 10.33 (0.46, 220.20) | 17.53 (1.88, 177.60) | 10.43 (1.61, 78.37) | 8.27 (0.91, 86.86) | 2.21 (0.20, 25.90) | 7.08 (1.07, 50.17) | Treatment supporter+Telephone |
Each cell represents the estimated comparative effect (odds ratio and 95% credible interval). In the cells below the diagonal, the ORs show comparative effects of the row interventions relative to the column treatment (e.g. the effect of SOC relative to eSOC is 0.68 with respect to adherence). In the cells above the diagonal, the ORs show comparative effects of the column interventions relative to the row treatment (e.g. the effect of eSOC relative to SOC is 1.47 with respect to adherence). Bold values indicate comparisons that are statistically significant. ORs above 1 indicate higher efficacy in adherence.
OR, odds ratio; CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; eSOC, enhanced standard of care; SOC, standard of care.