. 2016 Dec 2;11(12):e0166769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166769

Table 1. Genetic diversity of four P. pingi populations inferred as from two kinds of markers.

Populations			Microsatellite						mtDNA
	N	A	A_i	H_o	H_e(Ce)	H_e(Cd)	PIC	F_IS	h	H_d	π	D	F
YAH	33	9.25	2.763	0.740	0.751	0.701	0.724	0.225^**	6	0.67992	0.00491	0.96642	3.30335
JPH	41	10.50	2.821	0.770	0.815	0.760	0.793	0.103^**	6	0.27317	0.00324	- 1.76785^*	2.26913
MLW	40	9.167	2.496	0.657	0.726	0.678	0.698	0.262^**	13	0.69231	0.00212	- 0.83499	- 6.79958^*
WLW	65	11.75	2.734	0.740	0.820	0.765	0.801	0.275^**	15	0.59712	0.00306	- 1.00333	- 1.80300

N number of individuals analyzed, A mean number of alleles per population, A_i allelic richness, H_o observed heterozygosity, H_{e (Ce)} expected heterozygosity under random chromosomal segregation, H_{e (Cd)} expected heterozygosity under random chromatid segregation, PIC polymorphic information content, F_IS inbreeding coefficients per population, h number of haplotypes, H_d haplotype diversity, π nucleotide diversity, F Fu’s (Fs) values, D Tajima’s (D) values

* P < 0.05

** P < 0.01.