Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 31;8(4):1249. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1249

Table 1. Methods for cardiac rhythm monitoring.

PRO CONS
NON INVASIVE
Hospital Telemetry Accurate, also for asymptomatic events Only hospitalized patients
Holter ECG Easy to use, continuous recording, also for asymptomatic events Short monitoring
Event Recorder Longer monitoring Rhythm-symptoms correlation Not for asymptomatic events Requires patient’s trigger
INVASIVE
Implantable Loop Recorder Long periods of monitoring Remote monitoring Asymptomatic events Expensive and invasive False negative and positive Does not offer therapy
Pacemakers and Defibrillators Asymptomatic events Also therapeutic Only if therapeutic indication Expensive and invasive Complications