Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 31;113(46):E7159–E7168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605112113

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Mapping intracellular mechanics shows that metastatic breast cancer cells are softer than nontumorigenic cells and reveals differences in the distribution of intracellular viscoelasticity. (A) Relaxation curves for nontumorigenic MCF-10A cells (black) and for metastatic MDA-MB-231 cells (red). (B) Average values of the shear modulus G0, the storage modulus G′, and the loss modulus G″ in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells. (C) Maps showing the distribution of the shear modulus G0 in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells. (D) Plots of the shear modulus as a function of the distance to the nucleus in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells (Left) and corresponding shear modulus gradients (Right). (E) Immunofluorescence images of microtubules and actin in MCF-10A and MDA-MB-231 cells. (Scale bar, 10 µm.) Data were obtained from n = 43 and 54 beads in MCF-10A cells and in MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. Error bars represent SEs. P values are determined from Student’s t test for unpaired samples with respect to control cells (***P < 0.0001).