Table 1.
Case | Optimization | Variable conductivity? | Carbon cost increases as decreases? | β()= | MXTE |
1 | CMH | N | N | NA | NA |
2 | CMH | Y | N | NA | NA |
3 | CMH | N | Y | ||
4 | CMH | Y | Y | ||
5 | WUEH | N | N | ||
6 | WUEH | Y | N | ||
7 | WUEH | N | Y | ||
8 | WUEH | Y | Y |
Optimization column: CMH means net carbon gain maximization; WUEH means the constant marginal water use efficiency hypothesis. Variable conductivity column: Y means that K decreases with (empirically as a Weibull function); N means that K is equal to the constant Kmax. Carbon cost Increases as decreases column: Y means that the derivative of the cost function increases as decreases, which implies that the cost function itself is concave-up; N means that the cost function is constant (or zero) so that its derivative is zero. β = column: The optimal stomatal conductance in cases 3–8 is approximately proportional to in the special case in which TL ∼ Ta and photosynthesis is carbon or light limited (see text). Recall that β is the stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential. NA means “not applicable” because there is no internal optimum in cases 1 and 2. Instead, stomates are predicted to be always wide open in these cases. MXTE column: The MXTE is defined as