Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;4:e2730. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2730

Table 4. Summary of available growth estimates for lionfish in the invaded range.

Von Bertalanffy growth parameters (Lkt0), estimated size at age at 1, 2 and 3 years (L¯1,L¯2,L¯3), observed maximum size (Lmax) and age (La), and method of estimation for available studies of lionfish growth in the invaded and native range.

Location Sex L K t0 L¯1 L¯2 L¯3 Lmax Amax Method Temp (°C)a Reference
Atlantic Ocean
North Carolina Combined 455 0.32 −1.22 231 293 337 464 8.0 Otoliths 22.1 Potts, Berrane & Morris Jr (2010)
North Carolina Combined 425 0.47 −0.50b 169 265 325 464 8.0 Otoliths 22.1 Barbour et al. (2011)b
Northeast Florida Combined 448 0.47 0.00b 168 273 339 448 3.3c Length-based 21.4 Present study
Gulf of Mexico
Northeast Combinedd 393 0.54 −0.08 174 265 319 434e 4.5 Otoliths 21.8 Fogg et al. (2015)
West Combinedd 389 0.54 −0.34 200 279 325 434e 4.0 Otoliths 21.7 Fogg et al. (2015)
Southeast Combinedd 429 0.57 −0.16 208 304 358 434e 4.5 Otoliths 25.1 Fogg et al. (2015)
Yucatan Combined 420 0.88 0.11 228 340 387 389 n/a Length-based 29.3 Rodríguez-Cortés, Aguilar-Perera & Bonilla-Gómez (2015)
Florida Keys
Key Largo Combined 411 0.70 0.00b 207 310 361 452 n/a Length-based 26.3 Swenarton, Johnson & Akins (2014)
Caribbean Sea
Little Cayman Female 286 0.57 −1.01b 195 235 257 333 3.0 Otoliths 30.0 Edwards, Frazer & Jacoby (2014)
Little Cayman Male 382 0.38 −1.01b 204 260 299 391 5.0 Otoliths 30.0 Edwards, Frazer & Jacoby (2014)
Little Cayman Combinedf 349 0.42 −1.01b 199 250 284 391 5.0 Otoliths 30.0 Edwards, Frazer & Jacoby (2014)
Caymans/ Bahamas Combined 322 1.48 −0.07b 256 307 319 n/a n/a Tagging 29.7/28.7 Pusack et al. (2016)
Indo-Pacific
Philippines/ Marianas Combined 225 1.62 −0.07b 175 215 223 n/a n/a Tagging 30.2/28.1 Pusack et al. (2016)
x¯g 404.1 0.64 −0.33 204.0 288.6 335.4 429.7 4.9
σ 42.2 0.33 0.45 28.9 27.2 28.4 32.2 1.6
CV 10.4 52.2 138.7 14.1 9.4 8.5 7.5 33.4

Notes.

a

Average temperatures represent regional long-term annual averages and do not reflect conditions at study locations at the time they were conducted.

b

Parameter value was fixed during growth curve fitting.

c

Re-analysis of data obtained from Potts, Berrane & Morris Jr (2010).

d

Maximum age adjusted for interval between estimated birth date and first annulus.

e

Lmax was not reported on a site-specific basis in Fogg et al. (2015) and represents combined data for all regions.

f

The estimates reflect combined data from both sexes from Edwards, Frazer & Jacoby (2014).

g

Values include combined data from the invaded range and only independent estimates (e.g., Amax from Potts, Berrane & Morris Jr, 2010 and Barbour et al., 2011 is only included once because they use the same data set).