Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 29;8:217–224. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S104789

Table 2.

Results of the most common patient-related outcome surveys on health-related quality of life and pain scores

Trial Instrument Survey frequency Response rate (response rate per arm) % Response rate (% response rate per arm) Median time to deterioration
HRQoL
AFFIRM15 FACT-P Before randomization, Weeks 13, 17, 21, 25, and every 12 weeks thereafter 938/1,199 (674/800, 264/399) 78% (84%, 66%) 9 months (enzalutamide) vs 3.7 months (placebo); p<0.0001
PREVAIL16 FACT-P Baseline, Weeks 5, 13, and every 12 weeks thereafter 1,669/1,717 (856/872, 813/845) 97% (98%, 96%) 11.3 months (enzalutamide) vs 5.6 months (placebo); p<0.001
EQ-5D Baseline, Week 13 and every 12 weeks thereafter 1,448/1,717 (818/872, 630/845) 84% (93%, 75%) 19.2 months (enzalutamide) vs 11.1 months (placebo); p<0.0001
STRIVE17 FACT-P Not reported Not reported Not reported 8.4 months (enzalutamide) vs 8.3 months (bicalutamide); p=0.49
TERRAIN18 FACT-P Not reported Not reported Not reported 13.8 months (enzalutamide) vs 8.5 months (bicalutamide); p=0.026
Pain
Pain progression at Week 13
AFFIRM15 BPI-SF Baseline, Week 13 daily for 7 days 830/1,199 (591/800, 239/399) 69% (74%, 60%) 28% enzalutamide vs 38% placebo (p<0.0018)
PREVAIL16 BPI-SF Baseline, Weeks 13 and 25 1,379/1,717 (769/872, 610/845) 80% (88%, 72%) 29% enzalutamide vs 42% placebo (p<0.0001)

Abbreviations: FACT-P, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate; BPI-SF, Brief Pain Inventory – Short Form; HRQoL, health-related quality of life.