Table 5.

Tumor characteristics annotation distributions, binned according to crucial staging values. The value of “[0, 1, 2–3, > 3]” was for a case in which the full number of lesions was given, but it was unclear how many were malignant, resulting in an unknown lesion inequality after subtraction < 5.

Annotation categories
Tumor counts	Number	Freq.
Benign	0	69
	1	8
	2–3	10
	> 3	8
	[2–3, > 3]	6
Indet	0	62
	1	19
	2–3	9
	> 3	4
	[2–3, > 3]	7
Malig	0	3.0
	1	54
	2–3	25
	> 3	13
	[2–3, > 3]	6
Unk	0	89
	1	5
	2–3	2
	> 3	2
	[2–3, > 3]	2.0
	[0, 1, 2–3, > 3]	1.0
Largest size	Size (cm)	Freq.
	[0,3)	43
	[3,5]	26
	(5–10)	17
	[10,)	10
	n/a	5
>50%	Label	Freq.
	n/a	4
	no	83
	yes	14