Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 5;7:591. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00591

Table 1.

Overview of the analyzed studies.

Study, year Study design No. of participants and training statusa Exercise protocol Intervention Time point of environmental exposure or intervention manipulation Performance measurement (total time or mean power output (MPO) in watts) PEDro Score
OXYGEN AVAILABILITY
Amann et al., 2006 Crossover 8 Well-trained male cyclists (63.3 ± 1.3 ml kg−1min−1) 5 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21; CON.), hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.15; INTER), iso-oxia (FiO2 = 0.24–0.30; INTER) and hyperoxia (FiO2 = 1.00; INTER) Exposure 3 min before trial, after a warm-up in normoxia FiO2: 0.21 = 458 ± 7 s FiO2: 0.15 = 483 ± 8 s FiO2: 0.24–0.30 = 351 ± 7 s FiO2: 1.00 = 439 ± 7 s 9
Clark et al., 2007 Crossover 10 Well-trained male cyclists and triathletes (67.7 ± 1.3 ml kg−1min−1) 5 min cycling time-trial Time-trial in normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21; CON) and hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.19; 0.16; and 0.14 INTER) Exposure before, during and after warm-up. Total of 40 min in hypoxia before trial FiO2: 0.21 = 367 ± 42 MPO FiO2: 0.19 = 346 ± 41 MPO FiO2: 0.16 = 329 ± 38 MPO FiO2: 0.14 = 294 ± 37 MPO 10
Périard and Racinais, 2016 Crossover 12 Well-trained male cyclists Cycling time-trial to complete 750 kJ Time-trial in normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21; CON) and hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.15; INTER) Exposure 5 min before trial, after a warm-up in normoxia FiO2: 0.21 = 48.2 ± 5.7 min FiO2: 0.15 = 60.1 ± 6.5 min 9
Tucker et al., 2007 Crossover 11 Well-trained male cyclists (395 ± 33 PPO) 20 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in normoxia (FiO2 = 0.21; CON) and hyperoxia (FiO2 = 0.40; INTER) Time point unknown, including oxygen inhaled in warm-up FiO2: 0.21 = 28 ± 8 min FiO2: 0.40 = 27 ± 34 min 9
HEAT-STRESS
Abbiss et al., 2008 Crossover 10 Well-trained male cyclists (61.7 ± 5.0 ml kg−1min−1) 16.1 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in temperate (18.1°C, 58% RH; CON) and heat (32°C, 50% RH; INTER) Exposure during warm-up (90 min fixed workload) and at rest. Total of 116.3 min in heat before trial 18.1°C = 25.4 ± 1.6 min 32°C = 27.5 ± 1.9 min 8
Altareki et al., 2009 Crossover 9 Competitive male triathletes and cyclists (61.7 ± 8.6 ml kg−1min−1) 4 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in cool (13°C, 40%; CON) and heat (35°C, 60% RH; INTER) Exposure before, during and after warm-up. Total of 21 min in heat before trial 13°C = 382.8 ± 18.2 s 35°C = 390.1 ± 19.6 s 8
Castle et al., 2012 Crossover 7 Recreational male cyclists (58.8 ± 5.7 ml kg−1min−1) 30 min cycling time-trial Time-trial in temperate (22°C, 43% RH; CON) and heat (31°C, 64% RH; INTER) Exposure during a 7 min warm-up in heat before trial 22°C = 179.9 ± 50.9 MPO 31°C = 168.1 ± 54.1 MPO 9
Peiffer and Abbiss, 2011 Crossover 9 Trained male cyclists (60.5 ± 4.5 ml kg−1min−1) 40 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in temperate (22°C, 40% RH; CON), cool (17°C, 40% RH; INTER), warm (27°C 40% RH; INTER), and hot (32°C, 40% RH; INTER) Time point unknown, including temperature in warm-up 17°C = 58.8 ± 2.0 min 22°C = 59.0 ± 2.3 min 27°C = 59.1 ± 2.3 min 32°C = 60.7 ± 2.9 min 8
Périard et al., 2011 Crossover 8 Well-trained male cyclists (66.4 ± 5.3 ml kg−1min−1) 40 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in temperate (20°C, 40%: CON) and heat (35°C, 60% RH; INTER) Exposure 5 min before trial, after a warm-up in temperate 20°C = 59.8 ± 2.6 min 35°C = 64.3 ± 2.8 min 8
Périard and Racinais, 2015 Crossover 11 Well-trained cyclists, 10 males and 1 female (60.2 ± 6.3 ml kg−1min−1) Cycling time-trial to 750 kJ complete Time-trial in temperate (20°C, 40%; CON) and heat (35°C, 60% RH; INTER) Exposure 5 min before trial, after a warm-up in temperate 20°C = 48.8 ± 12.7 min 35°C = 55.8 ± 14.4 min 8
Périard and Racinais, 2016 Crossover 12 Well-trained male cyclists Cycling time-trial to 750 kJ complete Time-trial in temperate (18°C, 40%; CON) and heat (35°C, 60% RH; INTER) Exposure 5 min before trial, after a warm-up in temperate 18°C = 48.2 ± 5.7 min 35°C = 55.4 ± 5.0 min 8
Schmit et al., 2016 Parallel group 34 Well-trained triathletes, gender unknown. Temperate (n = 22; 63.3 ± 2.1 ml kg−1min−1), Heat (n = 12; 62.2 ± 3.6) 20 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in temperate (21°C, 50%; CON) acute heat exposure (35°C, 50% RH at 0; INTER and 11 ± 4 days; INTER) Exposure 15 min before trial during a warm-up, the second heat trail took place 11 ± 4 days after trial 1 with no acclimatization 0 days 21°C = 32.2 ± 2.0 min 35°C = 33.2 ± 1.58 min 11 ± 4 days after first trial 21°C = 31.5 ± 1.4 min 35°C = 32.4 ± 1.2 min 7
Tatterson et al., 2000 Crossover 11 National male road cyclists (66.7 ± 13.6) 30 min cycling time-trial Time-trial in temperate (23°C, 60% RH; CON) and heat (32°C, 60% RH; INTER) Time point unknown, including temperature in warm-up 23°C = 345 ± 9 MPO 32°C = 323 ± 8 MPO 8
Tucker et al., 2004 Crossover 10 Recreational male cyclists (376 ± 47 PPO) 20 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in cool (15°C, 60% RH; CON) and heat (35°C, 60% RH; INTER) Time point unknown, including temperature in warm-up 15°C = 28.8 ± 1.8 min 35°C = 29.6 ± 1.9 min 8
VanHaitsma et al., 2016 Crossover 20 Trained male cyclists (54.8 ± 5.9) 40 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in temperate (21°C, 20% RH; CON) and heat (35°C, 25% RH; INTER) Time point unknown, including temperature in warm-up 21°C = 75.2 ± 6.6 min 35°C = 79.0 ± 7.2 min 8
PRE-COOLING STRATEGIES
Barwood et al., 2012 Crossover 11 Trained male cyclists 40 km cycling time-trial Time-trial in heat (32°C, 53% RH) with use of no spray (CON), menthol spray (INTER) and placebo cooling spray (INTER) 10 min warm-up in heat, existed chamber (5 min rest in ~22°C), re-entered and sprayed with solution. Total of ~23 min in heat CON = 71.58 ± 62 min Placebo = 70.94 ± 6.1 min Menthol = 71.04 ± 5.5 min 9
Byrne et al., 2011 Crossover 7 Recreational male cyclists 30 min cycling time-trial Time-trial in the heat (32°C, 60% RH) ingesting 900mL of hot (37°C; CON) or cold fluid (2°C; INTER) 10 min before trial After fluid ingestion, 5 min at rest in heat, temperature of warm-up unknown 37°C fluid = 261 ± 22 MPO 2°C fluid = 275 ± 27 MPO 8
Duffield et al., 2010 Crossover 8 Moderate to well-trained male cyclists (lactate threshold 221 ± 42 W) 40 min cycling time-trial Time-trial in the heat (33°C, 50% RH) with (INTER) and without (CON) lower body cold water immersion (CWI) at 14°C before trial 20 min of CWI, 5 min warm-up in heat. Time between CWI and warm up ~8–10 min, ≤ 5 min from warm-up and trial start CON = 178 ± 26 MPO 14°C CWI = 198 ± 25 MPO 8
Gonzales et al., 2014 Crossover 10 trained male cyclists (59.1 ± 7.0 ml kg−1min−1) 20 min cycling time-trial Time-trial in the heat (30°C, 79% RH) with (INTER) and without (CON) a cooling vest worn and refrigerated headband 18 min warm-up with cooling vest and headband in heat. Rested in heat for 10 min (no vest) before trial. Total of 28 min in heat CON = 222 ± 47 MPO Cooling vest = 239 ± 45 MPO 8
FEEDBACK MANIPULATIONS
Albertus et al., 2005 Crossover 15 Competitive male cyclists (397 ± 58 PPO) 20 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with correct fb (CON) and positive deception (Pos-fb; INTER) Informed traveled 25-m further than they had every km CON = 28.4 ± 1.6 min Pos-fb = 28.6 ± 1.5 min 8
Castle et al., 2012 Crossover 7 Recreational male cyclists (58.8 ± 5.7 ml kg−1min−1) 30 min cycling time-trial Time-trial in the heat without deception (31°C, 64% RH; CON) and with deception (told the temperature was 26°C, 60% RH, reality: 32°C, 65% RH; Pos-fb; INTER) From the onset of the trial and displayed incorrectly during trial on a computer screen CON = 179.9 ± 50.9 MPO Pos-fb = 184.4 ± 60.4 MPO 9
Jones et al., 2016b Parallel group 20 Trained male cyclists, CON (n = 10; 57.6 ± 6.7 ml kg−1min−1), Deception (n = 10; 58.7 ± 6.6 ml kg−1min−1) 16.1 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with accurate ride-alone fb (CON), against a pacer representing MPO of CON (Neutr-fb; INTER), unaware of MPO of pacer 102% above baseline (Neg-fb; INTER) and a subsequent ride-alone trial (not informed of deception in previous trial and not included in meta-analysis) From the onset of the trial Control Group: CON = 27:10 ± 2:08 min Neutr-fb = 26:47 ± 1:55 min Inform-fb = 26:55 ± 1:58 min Deception Group: CON = 27:00 ± 1:31 min Pos-fb = 26:41 ± 1:13 min Inform-fb = 26:56 ± 1:38 min 9
Jones et al., 2016a Parallel group 17 Trained male cyclists, CON (n = 9; 54.1 ± 5.9 ml kg−1min−1), Deception (n = 8; 53.3 ± 4.4 ml kg−1min−1) 16.1 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with accurate ride-alone fb (CON), against a pacer representing MPO of CON (Neutr-fb; INTER), unaware or aware that MPO of pacer was increased 102% above (Neg-fb; INTER) and a subsequent ride-alone trial after being informed of the nature of a previous trial (Inform-fb; INTER) From the onset of the trial Control Group: CON = 26:31 ± 1:44 min Neutr-fb = 26:15 ± 1:31 min Inform-fb = 26:40 ± 1:30 min Deception Group: CON = 26:40 ± 0:52 min Pos-fb = 26:22 ± 0:44 min Inform-fb = 26:34 ± 0:54 min 9
Shei et al., 2016 Crossover 14 Competitive male cyclists (61.6 ± 0.6 ml kg−1min−1) 4 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with correct fb ride-alone (CON), unaware of MPO of pacer 102% above baseline (Neg-fb; INTER) and a subsequent trial after deception was revealed with known pacer at 102% (Inform-fb; INTER) From the onset of the trial CON = 366.4 ± 3.6 MPO Neg-fb = 358.6 ± 2.7 MPO Inform-fb = 358.1 ± 2.8 MPO 8
Smits et al., 2016 Parallel group 20 Trained male cyclists and triathletes, CON (n = 10;53.7 ± 7.1 ml kg−1min−1) and No-fb (n = 10; 59.0 ± 7.7 ml kg−1min−1) 20 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with distance only fb (CON) and no fb (No-fb; INTER) From the onset of the trial, cyclists stopped at completed distance CON = 28.7 ± 3.7 min No-fb = 31.0 ± 2.8 min 8
Swart et al., 2009 Crossover 12 Competitive cyclists (56.6 ± 6.6 ml kg−1min−1) 40 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with distance only fb (CON) and no fb (No-fb; INTER) From the onset of the trial, at final km, cyclists were then informed they had 1-km to complete CON = 265.5 ± 36.4 MPO No-fb = 256.6 ± 36.6 MPO 8
Waldron et al., 2015 Crossover 9 Well-trained male cyclists (60.5 ± 3.3 ml kg−1min−1) 4 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with correct ascending fb (CON) and increased ascending fb by 102% compared to CON (Pos-fb; INTER) An ascending distance clock was continuously displayed and visible to participants CON = 354 ± 39 s Pos-fb = 372 ± 36 s 9
Williams et al., 2012 Parallel group 22 Non-competitive and untrained males in cycling, CON (n = 11) and No-fb (n = 11) groups (50 ± 9 ml kg−1min−1) 4 km cycling time-trial Time-trial with distance only fb (CON) and no fb (No-fb; INTER) From the onset of the trial, cyclists stopped at completed distance Group 1 CON = 198 ± 39 MPO No-fb = 179 ± 47 MPO Group 2 CON = 181 ± 37 MPO No-fb = 171 ± 53 MPO 9
a

Data for VO2max in mL/kg/min and peak power output in watts are presented in mean ± standard deviations. PPO, peak power output; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; RH, relative humidity; CON, control trial; INTER, intervention trial; fb, feedback; Pos-fb, positive deceptive feedback; Neg-fb, negative deceptive feedback; Neutr-fb, neutral feedback; No-fb, no; Inform-fb, informed of the nature of a previous trial.