Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1539–1550. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160252

Table 5.

Correlations Among Significant Language Variables and AVLT

Semantic Units AVLT Total Score Letter Fluency Category Fluency Unique Words Prop.Idea Density
Semantic Units Pearson Correlation 1 .331** .257* .177 .486** −.029
Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .023 .122 .000 .799
N 78 78 78 78 78 78

AVLT Total Score Pearson Correlation 1 .472** .491** .393** .124
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .278
N 78 78 78 78 78

Letter Fluency Pearson Correlation 1 .544** .406** .397**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000
N 78 78 78 78

Category Fluency Pearson Correlation 1 .265* .188
Sig. (2-tailed) .019 .100
N 78 78 78

Unique Words Pearson Correlation 1 .233*
Sig. (2-tailed) .040
N 78 78

Prop.Idea Density Pearson Correlation 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 78
**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlation matrix of the discourse variables that were significantly different between groups with category and letter fluency, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning and Memory Test scores.