Table 2. Refinement, validation and analysis of the deposited models.
Model | N14C3, conservative | N14C3, optimistic | N14A3 |
---|---|---|---|
Refinement | |||
PDB entry | 5l9d | 5l88 | 5l7x (5lgh) |
R free (5% set) | 0.215 | 0.211 | 0.228 |
R work | 0.176 | 0.170 | 0.190 |
ΔR | 0.039 | 0.041 | 0.038 |
TLS groups | 4 (VH, VL + glycan, CH1, CL) | 4 (VH, VL + glycan, CH1, CL) | 4 (VH, VL + glycan, CH1, CL) |
No. of atoms | |||
Protein | 3280 | 3300 | 3224 |
‘Ligand’ | 97 | 189 | 64 |
Waters | 221 | 252 | 223 |
All refined non-H | 3598 | 3741 | 3511 |
〈B〉 (Å2) | |||
Protein atoms | 33.5 | 35.6 | 39.0 |
‘Ligand’ atoms | 61.5 | 74.4 | 59.2 |
Waters | 40.0 | 41.6 | 41.5 |
All refined non-H atoms | 34.7 | 38.0 | 39.5 |
Refined occupancy groups | 12 | 13 | 4 |
Glycans | Asn26L-NAG | Asn26L-NAG-FUC | Asn26L-NAG |
PEG fragments | 7 | 14 | 5 |
Missing residues | 6 | 3 | 16 |
Coordinate errors (Å) | |||
Free | 0.139 | 0.140 | 0.139 |
σA | 0.119 | 0.120 | 0.141 |
Cruickshank DPI | 0.154 | 0.156 | 0.154 |
F o versus F c correlation | 0.967 | 0.970 | 0.968 |
F o versus F c correlation, free | 0.956 | 0.956 | 0.955 |
R.m.s.d., bond lengths (Å) | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.011 |
R.m.s.d., angles (°) | 1.36 | 1.37 | 1.50 |
Geometry | |||
Elbow angle (°) | 139 | 139 | 147 |
Clashes, true, reported | 4 of 10 | 5 of 11 | 3 of 3 |
Ramachandran† | |||
Total | 431 | 436 | 412 |
Allowed | 7 | 8 | 6 |
Outliers | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Real-space R outliers, RSRZ > 2 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Side-chain rotamer outliers | 6 | 9 | 14 |
Buried contact surface, reported, L+H‡ (Å2) | 6350, 1834 | 9640, 1854 | 5250, 1700 |
LLDF ‘ligand’ outliers | 5 of 9 | 10 of 17 | 5 of 6 |
As determined using the Ramachandran plot boundaries by Lovell et al. (2003 ▸).
L+H signifies the actual surface contact area between protein residues of the L and H chains, obtained by excluding the solvent molecules from the contact calculation (cf. the output of the detailed contact tables provided by the PISA web service at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/pisa/).