Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 12;19(11):pyw070. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw070

Table 6.

Linkage Disequilibrium among SNPs in TPH2

TPH2 rs7305115a rs4290270a rs7963717 rs4570625 rs11178998 rs7954758 rs1386494 rs2171363 rs1487278 rs1386483 rs1487279 (D’)
rs7305115a 0.69 0.41 0.70 0.41 0.39 1 0.98 0.94 0.71 0.66
rs4290270a 0.48 0.41 0.48 0.44 0.35 0.63 0.68 0.64 0.99 0.94
rs7963717 0.02 0.02 1 1 0.97 0.78 0.42 0.91 0.50 0.54
rs4570625 0.46 0.22 0.15 1 1 0.37 0.72 0.83 0.49 0.49
rs11178998 0.02 0.03 0.97 0.15 0.97 0.64 0.38 0.92 0.53 0.57
rs7954758 0.02 0.02 0.92 0.14 0.89 0.73 0.40 1 0.46 0.52
rs1386494 0.07 0.03 0.01 0.01 0 0 1 0.86 0.57 0.67
rs2171363 0.95 0.46 0.02 0.49 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.94 0.71 0.66
rs1487278 0.32 0.14 0.06 0.24 0.07 0.08 0.03 0.33 0.66 0.62
rs1386483 0.48 0.95 0.03 0.24 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.47 0.15 0.96
rs1487279 (r2) 0.44 0.87 0.04 0.23 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.42 0.14 0.88

D’ and r2 value are shown above and below the diagonal, respectively.

a SNPs of TPH2 mentioned in the previous research (Xu et al., 2012) with the same sample.