Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov;107(5):403–410. doi: 10.5935/abc.20160149

Table 4.

Assessment of reperfusion achieved with ppci

TIMI/MBG GRADES Tirofiban (%) Placebo (%) Ω p
TIMI PRE-PPCI     0-2 x 3
0 22 (91.6%) 29 (85.3%) (=1.00) ƒ
1 0(0%) 1 (2.9%)  
2 2 (8.3%) 2(5.8%)  
3 0(0%) 2 (5.8%)  
TIMI POST-PPCI     0-2 x 3
0 0(0%) 0(0%) (=0.40) ƒ
1 0(0%) 1 (2.9%)  
2 6 (25%) 12 (35.3%)  
3 18 (75%) 21 (61.7%)  
MBG PRE-PPCI     0-1 x 2-3
0 22 (91.6%) 29 (85.3%) (=1.00) ƒ
1 0 (0%) 2 (5.8%)  
2 2 (8.3%) 0 (0%)  
3 0 (0%) 3 (8.8%)  
MBG POST-PPCI     0–1 x 2–3
0 0 (0%) 0 (0%) (=0.13) ƒ
1 0(0%) 4 (11.7%)  
2 11 (45.8%) 10 (29.4%)  
3 13 (54.2%) 20 (58.8%)  
ECG/STR 90 min 90 min  
No STR (<30%) 0(0%) 9(26.5%) (=0.01) ƒ
STR (71-100%) 14 (58.3%) 15 (44.1%) (=0.42) ƒ
ECG/STR 24h 24h  
NO STR (<30%) 1(4.2%) 8 (23.5%) (=0.06) ƒ
STR (71-100%) 17 (71%) 15 (44.1%) (=0.06) ƒ

TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, according to the TIMI Study Group (1985); MBG: myocardial blush grade, according to the Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group (VAN’T HOF AW ,1998); PPCI: primary percutaneous coronary intervention; ECG: electrocardiogram; STR: ST elevation resolution; No STR: number of ST Elevation resolution

ƒ

comparison of TIMI 0 and 1 versus, TIMI 2 and 3, MBG 0 and 1 versus MBG 2 and 3, and patients with and without STR at 90min and at 24hours by Fisher Exact Test;

Ţ: p-value calculated by Student t-test (95%IC,0.32-31.28);

tirofiban percentage;

Ω

placebo percentage.