Table S4.
Model no. | Log Lik | Fixed effects | df | Wald statistic | P value | N species | N study | N observations | Notes |
9 | 107.5 | Intercept | 1, 16.8 | 4.23 | 0.056 | 18 | 33 | 140 | Full dataset |
Brood size | 1, 18.8 | 1.06 | 0.32 | ||||||
10 | 107.0 | Intercept | 1, 13.9 | 2.67 | 0.12 | ||||
Brood size | 1, 17.0 | 0.18 | 0.68 | ||||||
Predictability | 1, 11.3 | 0.69 | 0.42 | ||||||
Quality | 2, 133.0 | 7.61 | 0.00075 | ||||||
Predictability * Quality | 2, 133.0 | 3.74 | 0.026 | ||||||
11 | 84.0 | Intercept | 1, 12.4 | 2.24 | 0.16 | 16 | 30 | 115 | Excluding 2 species missing data on adult mortality or the broods possible each breeding season |
Brood size | 1, 14.7 | 0.88 | 0.36 | ||||||
No. of future broods possible | 1, 10.1 | 0.11 | 0.75 | ||||||
12 | 86.3 | Intercept | 1, 10.5 | 1.83 | 0.20 | ||||
Brood size | 1, 12.1 | 0.38 | 0.55 | ||||||
No. of future broods possible | 1, 11.4 | 0.21 | 0.66 | ||||||
Predictability | 1, 9.6 | 0.03 | 0.88 | ||||||
Quality | 2, 107.0 | 10.18 | 0.00009 | ||||||
13 | 75.0 | Intercept | 1, 5.2 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 10 | 20 | 80 | Excluding 8 species missing data on adult mortality, the broods possible each breeding season, or mating system |
Brood size | 1, 5.7 | 0.00 | 0.97 | ||||||
No. of future broods possible | 1, 4.3 | 0.24 | 0.65 | ||||||
Full vs. half siblings likelihood | 1, 4.3 | 0.46 | 0.53 | ||||||
14 | 73.6 | Intercept | 1, 4.0 | 0.99 | 0.38 | ||||
Brood size | 1, 4.3 | 0.10 | 0.77 | ||||||
No. of future broods possible | 1, 3.7 | 0.13 | 0.74 | ||||||
Full vs. half siblings likelihood | 1, 3.4 | 0.06 | 0.82 | ||||||
Predictability | 1, 3.6 | 0.16 | 0.72 | ||||||
Quality | 1, 73.0 | 4.83 | 0.011 |
Mean results of 500 ASReml linear mixed models. Models controlled for phylogeny, repeated measures on studies, and species, and were weighted by study sample size (the number of broods used to calculate the original test statistic). Fixed effects in bold are significant at the P < 0.05 level and in italics at the P < 0.10 level. Models are grouped by the dataset used for analysis, and the notes column describes the loss in sample size due to missing life history data. Models did not converge when promiscuity was included as a fixed effect.