Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 7;113(48):13803–13808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606378113

Table 1.

Results for all models: fixed effects

Model no. Fixed effects Results N species N study N observations
1 Siblings present y/n F1,71.8 = 6.69, P = 0.0097 60 108 336
2 Brood size F1,31.0 = 4.57, P = 0.033
3 Siblings present y/n F1,67.0 = 8.45, P = 0.0050 51 98 317
No. of future broods possible F1,87.9 = 3.13, P = 0.080
4 Brood size F1,82.2 = 11.87, P = 0.0009
No. of future broods possible F1,83.5 = 7.22, P = 0.0087
5 Siblings present y/n F1,84.2 = 0.42, P = 0.42 49 96 314
No. of future broods possible F1,95.4 = 9.39, P = 0.0028
Full vs. half siblings likelihood F1,112.5 = 6.94, P = 0.0096
6 Brood size F1,87.1 = 3.07, P = 0.083
No. of future broods possible F1,86.4 = 13.09, P = 0.0005
Full vs. half siblings likelihood F1,89.6 = 5.98, P = 0.016
7 Siblings present y/n F1,60.5 = 0, P = 1 31 68 230
No. of future broods possible F1,58.4 = 3.10, P = 0.083
Full vs. half siblings likelihood F1,76.0 = 3.77, P = 0.056
Extrapair paternity F1,58.5 = 0.04, P = 0.84
8 Brood size F1,66.2 = 3.87, P = 0.053
No. of future broods possible F1,58.3 = 4.94, P = 0.038
Full vs. half siblings likelihood F1,67.1 = 1.00, P = 0.32
Extrapair paternity F1,58.5 = 0.27, P = 0.61

Mean results (conditional Wald statistics) of 500 ASReml linear mixed models. Models controlled for phylogeny, repeated measures on studies, and species, and were weighted by study sample size (the number of broods used to calculate the original test statistic). Fixed effects in bold are significant at the P < 0.05 level and in italics at the P < 0.10 level. Models are grouped by the dataset used for analysis, as sample size decreased in later analyses due to unavailable life history data.