Table S2.
GAA (Cognate) | GAU | GGA | GAC | ||||||||||
Mutants | (kcat/Km)GTP | (kcat/Km)GTP | (kcat/Km)dip | I | F | (kcat/Km)GTP | (kcat/Km)dip | I | F | (kcat/Km)GTP | (kcat/Km)dip | I | F |
(µM-1s-1) | (mM-1s-1) | (mM-1s-1) | (mM-1s-1) | ||||||||||
WT | 8.1 ± 1.5 | 132 ± 10 | 1.26 ± 0.12 | 61 ± 12 | 105 ± 13 | 39 ± 3 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 209 ± 42 | 133 ± 17 | 51 ± 3 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 158 ± 31 | 134 ± 11 |
T1 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 95 ± 6 | 1.27 ± 0.07 | 58 ± 6 | 75 ± 6 | 28 ± 2 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 195 ± 20 | 104 ± 14 | 39 ± 2 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 142 ± 15 | 89 ± 8 |
T2 | 10.2 ± 1.9 | 124 ± 25 | 2.26 ± 0.23 | 82 ± 22 | 55 ± 12 | 36 ± 2 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 284 ± 55 | 60 ± 8 | 52 ± 3 | 0.89 ± 0.14 | 196 ± 38 | 59 ± 10 |
W1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 30 ± 7 | 1.56 ± 0.28 | 40 ± 11 | 19 ± 5 | 12 ± 2 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 192 ± 24 | 39 ± 7 | 17 ± 2 | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 72 ± 16 | 27 ± 4 |
W2 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 18 ± 3 | 1.10 ± 0.08 | 123 ± 32 | 17 ± 3 | 4.4 ± 2.1 | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 502 ± 263 | 23 ± 12 | 6.6 ± 1.6 | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 336 ± 106 | 19 ± 5 |
Kinetic efficiency for cognate and near-cognate GTP hydrolysis, (kcat/Km)GTP, were estimated from experiments with ribosomes at 1 and 2 µM, which are always in excess over ternary complex. The rate of GTP hydrolysis at 2 µM was always twice that at 1 µM with virtually identical kcat/Km estimates. Kinetic efficiencies for near-cognate dipeptide formation, (kcat/Km)dip, were derived from titrations of ternary complex in excess over ribosomes. Initial selection (I) was calculated from the ratio of cognate to near-cognate (kcat/Km)GTP parameters. Proofreading factor (F) was calculated from the ratio between near-cognate kcat/Km-values for GTP hydrolysis and dipeptide formation (see SI Materials and Methods). Data represent weighted averages from at least two independent experiments ± propagated SD.