Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 14;82(4):1011–1021. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13031

Table 2.

Population estimates for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for scopolamine

CL [α] ( l min −1 ) IIV (shrinkage) V c (l) IIV (shrinkage) V p [β] (l) IIV (shrinkage) Q ( min −1 ) CAC CWC CWV Error (σ 2 )
Scopolamine pharmacokinetics 1.09 ± 0.096* , 10.3% (9.7) 2.66 ± 1.050 74.1% (49.3) 62.10 ± 10.100 9.5% (25.6) 1.01 ± 0.247 −0.12 ± 0.019 0.56 ± 0.097 0.38 ± 0.120 0.045 (prop)
EC 50 [ε] (pg ml−1) IIV (shrinkage) E MAX (%) IIV (shrinkage) K IN [λ] IIV (shrinkage) K OUT CAB or CAE γ OC Error (σ2)
0‐back RT (msec) 1300 ± 363 99.8% (33.2) 0.837 ± 0.118 NA 3.42 ± 0.361* 10.5% (8.13) 0.00974 ± 0.00099 229 ± 40.9 NA NA 0.00999 (prop)
Saccadic inaccuracy (%) 55.1 ± 29.8 13.7% (36.9) 0.388 ± 0.079 49.9% (36.2) 22.8 ± 0.731 13.2% (21.86) 3.33 ± 0.0398 NA NA −0.06 ± 0.157 0.0493 (prop)
Saccadic peak velocity (deg sec−1) 2530 ± 213* 277.0% (20.9) 0.232 ± 0.00113 NA 1280 ± 21 9.9% (3.1) 2.73 ± 0.0468 34.0 ± 1.39 NA NA 768.0 (prop)
Adaptive tracker (%) 386 ± 22.6 85.5% (10.50) 1 NA 0.636 ± 0.0413 22.4% (4.1) 0.0294 ± 0.0018 NA 1.10 ± 0.063 NA 8.64 (add)
EEG alpha Fz‐Cz (μV) 2.55 ± 1.06 1530.0% (48.4) 0.232 ± 0.0258 95.4% (14.9) 0.206 ± 0.0344 46.6% (1.1) 0.0699 ± 0.0113 NA NA NA 0.0256 (prop)
EEG alpha Pz‐Oz (μV) 14.7 ± 0.168 1309.3% (27.9) 0.443 ± 0.00389 37.6% (18.0) 3.05 ± 0.135 57.9% (2.1) 0.553 ± 0.0055 NA NA NA 0.0429 (prop)
EEG delta Fz‐Cz (μV) 469 ± 70.8 154.5% (35.5) 0.419 ± 0.0515 325.4% (19.2) 0.0354 ± 0.00369* 28.9% (2.1) 0.0166 ± 0.00161 161 ± 30 NA 1.410 ± 0.722 (EC 50 vs. E MAX); −0.153 ± 0.0494 (E MAX vs. k in) 0.0338 (prop)
EEG delta Pz‐Oz (μV) 1230 ± 368 1166.2% (29.6) 0.537 ± 0.0601 55.8% (48.0) 0.726 ± 0.186* 30.3% (1.7) 0.348 ± 0.084 210 ± 63.7 NA NA 0.0304 (prop)
EEG theta Fz‐Cz (μV) 4110 ± 1410 2162.7% (31.1) 0.594 ± 0.106 NA 0.863 ± 0.0422* 28.4% (1.8) 0.594 ± 0.106 142 ± 24.7 NA NA 0.0297 (prop)
EEG theta Pz‐Oz (μV) 8240 ± 6270 1778.6% (27.9) 1.15 ± 0.179 NA 13 ± 8.79 33.4% (0.5) 6.08 ± 4.23 NA NA NA 0.0379 (prop)
EC 50 (pg ml−1) K IN IIV (shrinkage) K OUT E MAX (%) IIV (shrinkage) E 0 IIV (shrinkage) NA OC Error (σ2)
0‐back ratio (% correct answers) ** 2140 ± 1720 0.0354 ± 0.00244§ NA 0.036 ± 0.0061 1 631.3% (42.1) 3.77 ± 0.274 37.8% (20.1) NA 0.40 ± 0.141 0.0039 (add)
1‐back ratio (% correct answers) ** 0.624 ± 0.0053 1.10 ± 0.0175 578.5% (47.3) 221 ± 4.35 0.961 ± 0.00511 121.6% (30.0) 3.33 ± 0.0293 NA NA NA 0.0059 (add)
2‐back ratio (% correct answers) ** 212 ± 72.4 0.54 ± 0.103 NA 0.317 ± 0.0704 1.09 ± 0.248 109.8% (31.9) 2.84 ± 0.164 35.9% (21.5) NA 0.23 ± 0.107 0.0085 (add)

Parameters are reported as population estimate ± standard error. IIV: Inter‐individual variability expressed as coefficient of variation and shrinkage in parentheses. Baseline is calculated as the ratio of K in and K out.

*

Age used as a covariate (ε and λ in Equation B.1 of the Supplemental Materials section).

Weight used as covariate.

Exponent in EMAX (γ).

§

Four buffer compartments.

Omega block structure.

**

Parameters reported as natural log odds. Prop: proportional error. CAC: coefficient relating age and clearance. CWC: coefficient relating age and weight. CWV: coefficient relating apparent peripheral volume of distribution and weight. CAB: coefficient relating age and K IN. CAE: coefficient relating age and EC 50. OC: correlation between Omegas. E 0: baseline. Add: additive error. NA: not applicable. Please refer to the Supplemental Materials section for the model equations and the parameter‐covariate relationships.