Table 2.
Variable | n (%) | HEI Index Point Estimate | 95% CI | Overall p-value | Fast Food for Family Meals Point Estimate | 95% CI | Overall p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is TV on in room and/or in adjoining room? | 120 (100%) | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||
Neither weekday nor weekend | 40 (33.3%) | 48.85a | (46.86, 50.84) | 0.80a | (0.45, 1.14) | ||
Either weekday or weekend | 28 (23.3%) | 48.22ab | (43.33, 53.10) | 1.12ab | (0.67, 1.56) | ||
Both weekday and weekend | 52 (43.3%) | 44.01b | (41.55, 46.47) | 1.66b | (1.22, 2.10) | ||
Is family paying attention to any TV? | 80 (100%) | 0.08 | <0.01 | ||||
Not Paying Attention | 28 (35%) | 42.27a | (38.23, 46.30) | 1.00a | (0.64, 1.35) | ||
Paying Attention | 52 (65%) | 46.59a | (43.80, 49.38) | 1.76b | (1.32, 2.21) |
Note: Models adjusted for primary caregiver sex and age. Within-group point estimates that do not share a superscript letter are significantly different at p<0.05.
Interpretation Example: The relationships between the presence of TV and whether the family was paying attention to TV on child dietary intake (HEI Index) and serving fast food at family meals were examined, controlling for parent sex and age. There was evidence of a negative association between the number of days that TV was on in the dining room or in an adjoining room and both HEI (p=0.01) and fast food (p=0.01). The effect of paying attention to TV in any room increased serving fast food at family meals (p<0.01); however, the association with HEI was not significant (p=0.08).