Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2016 Jul 25;21(4):603–620. doi: 10.1037/met0000088

Table 4.

Predictive Validity of Scales in Training/Test and Hold-Out Samples

Performance Measure SPCA Regularization Boosting Naïve MLE
Scale Length (number of items) 16 21 27 57
Training/Test Sample N = 2472
Peak Accuracy (% Correct Classification) 61% 64% 64% 65%
Point Biserial Correlation 0.26 0.32 0.35 .37
Spearman Correlation 0.26 0.33 0.35 .37
Pseudo R2 0.08 0.12 0.15 0.16
HR for +1 SD Scale Score 1.51 1.6 1.78 1.87
AUC .65 .65 .69 .71
Hold-Out Sample N = 1237
Peak Accuracy (% Correct Classification) 61% 65% 65% 63%
Biserial Correlation 0.25 0.31 0.33 .33
Spearman Correlation 0.24 0.31 0.33 .33
Pseudo R2 0.07 0.11 0.13 0.14
HR for +1 SD Scale Score 1.47 1.57 1.73 1.76
AUC 0.64 0.68 0.69 .69

Notes: AUC = Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve; HR = Hazard Rate; MLE = Maximum Likelihood Estimate; SPCA = Supervised Principal Components. The final column, “Naïve MLE”, pertains to a Cox model with no shrinkage or variable selection (i.e., standard Cox model MLEs for all 57 items).