Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 6;15:586. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1642-6

Table 3.

Marginal effect of larviciding in Zimbabwe and Botswana

Larvae type Marginal effect IRR (CI) P value % reduction
All larvae
Both countries −1.94 0.14 (0.09; 0.23) <0.001 86
Zimbabwe −1.06 0.35 (0.24; 0.51) <0.001 65
Botswana −2.51 0.08 (0.06; 0.11) <0.001 92
Larval stage
Early instar
Both countries −1.47 0.23 (0.17; 0.32) <0.001 77
Zimbabwe −1.23 0.29 (0.17; 0.50) <0.001 71
Botswana −1.83 0.16 (0.12; 0.22) <0.001 84
Late instar
Both countries −2.40 0.09 (0.04; 0.19) <0.001 91
Zimbabwe −0.56 0.57 (0.31; 1.03) 0.062 43
Botswana −4.04 0.02 (0.01; 0.04) <0.001 98
Larvae species
ALL Anopheles
Both countries −1.63 0.20 (0.05; 0.76) 0.019 80
Zimbabwe −0.64 0.53 (0.30; 0.92) <0.025 47
Botswana −3.01 0.05 (0.02; 0.13) <0.001 95
ALL Culex
Both countries −1.03 0.36 (0.10; 1.23) 0.102 64
Zimbabwe −0.86 0.42 (0.26; 0.68) <0.001 58
Botswana −2.21 0.11 (0.05; 0.27) <0.001 89