Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 5;16:1224. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3883-2

Table 2.

Pre and post-test average scores and relative gain among participating MDs

Specialties N Benefits and Risks of PA PA assessment PA prescription
Pre Post Relative gain [95% CI] Pre Post Relative gain [95% CI] Pre Post Relative gain [95% CI]
General 349 71% 85% 26%*+ 54% 71% 42%* 67% 88% 45%*
Practitioner [21–30%] [35–49%] [37–52%]
Family 92 74% 87% 25%* 54% 73% 59%* 71% 89% 36%*
Medicine [15–35%] [41–77%] [23–49%]
Internal 194 75% 85% 22%*+ 56% 71% 46%* 73% 88% 30%+°
Medicine [15–29%] [34–57%] [22–38%]
IM Sub. 44 74% 86% 21%+ 55% 75% 50%* 74% 88% 24%+°
[9–33%] [28–72%] [11–38%]
Pediatrics 52 74% 84% 19%+ 54% 67% 37% 72% 90% 40%*
[12–25%] [21–52%] [23–57%]
Cardiology 59 64% 75% 24%*+ 56% 65% 34% 69% 80% 27%
[15–34%] [13–54%] [10–44%]
Sports 77 85% 91% 11%+ 70% 81% 21%+ 81% 96% 20%+
Medicine [6–16%] [11–31%] [14–26%]
Other 177 66% 83% 39%* 51% 68% 48%* 65% 88% 47%*
Specialties [30–47%] [37–60%] [35–58%]
Total 1044 72% 85% 26% 55% 71% 43% 70% 89% 38%
[23%–28%] [39%–48%] [34%–42%]

*: Significantly higher than Sports medicine (p < 0.05)

+: Significantly lower than other (p < 0.05)

°: Significantly lower than General practitioners (p < 0.05)

IM Sub Internal medicine subspecialties others than Cardiology (immunology, endocrinology, pulmonology, nephrology, gastroenterology, hematology, intensive care specialists, and infectious diseases specialists)