Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 6;12(12):e1005198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005198

Fig 2. Inferred RBP-mRNA interactions improve accuracy in predicting protein abundance of a portion of the total modeled mRNAs in three panels of tissues and cell lines.

Fig 2

While RBPplus models improve accuracy (R2) in predicted protein abundance over RNAonly models, improvements attained by RBPs were not distinguishable from those by randomly sampled proteins, for the majority of genes considered in the three panels. The proportion of genes where actual RBPs produced higher accuracy than random protein predictors (q < 0.05) increases from 0.65% in the NCI-60 panel to 4.2% in the normal tissue panel. (A) Distribution of R2 coefficients for the actual RNAonly and RBPplus models as well as for the RBPplus models randomized either by permuting sample labels (RBPplusr.by.sample) or by randomly sampling proteins in place of actual RBPs (RBPplusr.by.RBP). (B) Histogram of statistical significance estimates for the RBPplus models which were obtained randomizing the actual RBPplus models by randomly sampling proteins. (C) Histogram of statistical significance estimates for the RBPplus models which were obtained randomizing the actual RBPplus models by permuting sample labels. Dashed line corresponds to the number of genes expected in each bin under the assumption of a uniform distribution.