Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2016 Oct 27;65:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.10.012

Table 1.

Studies examining the effect of tobacco cessation or quitting smoking on substance use outcomes (N=24)

Authors (Year) Study Design Sample Description* Smoking Variable Assessed SU Outcome of Interest Cessation/Treatment Synopsis of Findings
Positive Impact
1. Berg, Piper, Smith, Fiore, Jorenby (2015) Secondary analysis of RCT, bupropion, NRT, counseling N=1,301, mean age 45, 59% female, 84% white, 48% history alcohol abuse, 10% history of alcohol dependence, smokers N/A, investigated changes pre and post target quit date Mean number of drinks per day 2 weeks pre and post target quit date Smoking Cessation Positive
Generally, alcohol use decreased post-target quit date. Smokers who reported less pre-quit alcohol use, as well as smokers who were female, non-white, and had a history of alcohol dependence tended to use less alcohol post-quit
2. Magee, Winhusen (2015) Secondary analysis of multisite RCT, SUD treatment with or without smoking cessation treatment, counseling, bupropion, contingency management N=538, mean age 36, 48% female, adults with cocaine or methamphetamine SUD N/A, investigated impact of smoking cessation intervention Stimulant craving Smoking Cessation Positive
Smoking cessation eliminated coupling between nicotine craving and stimulant craving, γ = −.07, p = .39. Conclusions: Contrary to concerns about nicotine abstinence during substance dependence treatment, increases in nicotine craving may be associated with later reductions in stimulant craving and use
3. Cavazos-Rehg, Breslau, Hatsukami, Krauss, Spitznagel, Grucza, Salyer, Hartz, Bierut (2014) Prospective cohort, NESARC N=4,853, adults, 48% female, 77% white Usual number of cigarettes per day, self-report Past year diagnosis DSM-IV alcohol use disorder or drug use disorder Smoking Cessation Positive
Among daily smokers who had current or lifetime history diagnosis of the outcome of interest at Wave 1, quitting by Wave 2 predicted a decreased risk of mood/anxiety disorder (aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4, 0.9) and alcohol disorder (aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5, 0.99) at Wave 2. Among daily smokers with no lifetime history diagnosis of the outcome of interest at Wave 1, quitting smoking by Wave 2 predicted a decreased risk of drug use disorder at Wave 2 aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.9).
4. Dawson, Goldstein, Grant (2013) Prospective cohort N=14,885, adult past-year ≥ monthly drinkers Smokers at baseline but not during year preceding follow-up, self-report One year alcohol abstinence Smoking Cessation Positive
Smoking cessation associated with drinking cessation over follow-up, OR=2.82 (95% CI=1.62–4.92) to 3.45 (2.20–5.39)
5. Piper, Rodock, Cook, Schlam, Fiore, Baker (2013). RCT, bupropion, NRT, counseling N=1,470, mean age 45, 58% female, 84% white, smokers 7-day point prevalence abstinence, biochemically verified (breath CO) Past year SUD diagnosis Smoking Cessation Positive
Participants who were smoking at the Year 3 follow-up were more likely to have developed and maintained a substance use or major depressive disorder by that time than were individuals who were abstinent at Year 3
6. Metrik, Spillane, Leventhal, Kahler (2011) RCT, counseling, NRT, brief alcohol intervention N=216, mean age 42, 45% female, 91% white, heavy drinkers seeking smoking cessation treatment N/A, investigated impact of smoking cessation intervention Number of drinks/week, percent of marijuana use days Smoking Cessation Treatment Intervention Positive
All participants made large reductions in weekly alcohol consumption during the trial, with weekly marijuana users also reducing their marijuana use. Frequent marijuana smokers may benefit from smoking cessation even when not explicitly discussed
7. Tsoh, Chi, Mertens, Weisner (2011) Retrospective cohort/chart review N=1,951, adults, 39% female, 75% white, Kaiser patients from 1994–98 Current cigarette smoking, self-report 1 year alcohol or drug abstinence at 5, 7, and 9 years; past-year remission SUD Smoking Cessation Positive
Stopping smoking during the first year after substance use treatment intake predicted better long-term substance use outcomes through 9 years after intake
8. Brown, Strong, Abrantes, Myers, Ramsey, Kahler (2009) RCT, motivational interviewing, brief advice N=191, adolescents mean age 15, 62% female, 95% white, mental hospital inpatients N/A, investigated impact of smoking cessation intervention Percentage of days with substance use (alcohol and illicit drugs) Smoking Cessation Treatment Intervention Positive
The results of this study suggest that MI for smoking cessation had a significant effect in preventing an increase in substance use during the first 6 months following hospitalization
9. de Dios, Vaughan, Stanton, Niaura (2009) Multi-site prospective cohort N=1,779, adolescents mean age 16, 30% female, 57% white, in SUD treatment Current cigarette smoking, self-report Relapse to alcohol and marijuana; time to relapse to alcohol and marijuana Smoking Cessation Positive
Persistent smokers and smoking initiators had significantly greater odds of alcohol and marijuana relapse and shorter periods to marijuana relapse at follow-up compared with quitters
10. Myers, Doran, Brown (2007) Prospective cohort, secondary analysis N=123, adolescents, mean age 16, 41% female, 81% white, in SUD treatment Smoking abstinence for > 1 year, self-report Alcohol use trajectory (abstainers, infrequent drinkers, worse over time, frequent drinkers) Smoking Cessation Positive
Larger proportion of quitters (v. persistent smokers) were alcohol abstainers compared to frequent drinkers
11. Satre, Kohn, Weisner (2007) Prospective cohort N=598, smokers: n=315, mean age 36, 44% female, 76% white, non-smokers: n=283, mean age 40, 42% female, 71% white, Kaiser, CA, admitted 1997–1998, health plan members Current cigarette smoking, self-report Addiction Severity Index scores, 30 day abstinence from alcohol and drugs Smoking Cessation Positive
Smokers were less likely to be abstinent from alcohol and drugs in the prior 30 days (48.3% vs. 64.0%), and had higher Addiction Severity Index scores
Null Impact
12. Alessi and Petry (2014) RCT, frequent monitoring and behavioral support or that plus contingency management N=45 – behavioral support: N=21, 100% male, mean age 37, 43% Black, 48% European American; contingency management: N=24, 100% male, mean age 38, 17% Black, 79% European American Percent of days CO-negative (biochemically validated) Study attendance, study adherence, days of self-reported drug use (biochemically validated) Smoking Cessation Treatment Intervention Null
No study withdrawals, no difference by treatment arm for adherence, days of self-reported substance use, or drug-positive urine tests.
13. Kahler, Borland, Hyland, McKee, O’Connor, Fong, Cummings (2010) Prospective cohort N=3,614, mean age 42, 47% female, 95.8%, adult daily smokers from AU, CA, UK, US Smoking abstinence for > 6 months, self-report Drinking frequency, number of drinks per day and heavy or “binge” drinking frequency Smoking Cessation Null
No difference in reduction in drinking by quitters compared to non-quitters
14. Callaghan, Brewster, Johnson, Taylor, Beach, Lentz (2007) Retrospective cohort, NRT available on request N=520, adolescents mean age 17, 57% female, 39% Aboriginal ancestry, in SUD treatment N/A, investigated impact of smoking ban at SUD treatment facility SUD treatment enrollment and treatment completion Smoking Cessation Null
The total smoking ban was not associated with a lower proportion of adolescent smokers seeking treatment or a lower treatment completion rate among smokers compared to nonsmokers
15. Rohsenow, Tidey, Martin, Colby, Sirota, Swift, Monti (2015) RCT, contingent vouchers, motivational interviewing, brief advice N=184, mean age 35, 55% female, 83% white, smokers in SUD treatment N/A, investigated impact of smoking cessation intervention Number of heavy drinking days and biochemically verified number of drug use days at each follow up and relapse at 1 year Smoking Cessation Treatment Intervention Null
No differential effects on drug use
Mixed Impact (positive and null)
16. Lisha, Carmody, Humfleet, Delucchi (2014) Secondary analysis of 2 RCTs, smoking cessation interventions, NRT, counseling, estimated both synchronous (within day) and lagged (across day) forecasts between smoking and alcohol use N=302, mean age 48, 9% female, 50% white, adults with HIV & adults in alcohol use disorder treatment Number of cigarettes, timeline follow-back, 7-day point prevalence abstinence, biochemically verified (breath CO) Alcohol use number of drinks Smoking Cessation Positive & null by subgroup/Null overall
In the overall sample, there was no difference in alcohol use between those who stopped smoking (even for one day) and those who never stopped (t(300) = 0.08, p = .93). When broken up by study there was a significant reduction in the alcohol dependent sample: t(137) = 2.88, p < .0001. The mean number of drinks was 29.76 (SD = 90.9) for those who stopped v. 131.7 (SD = 324.5) for those who did not.
17. Reitzel, Nguyen, Eischen, Thomas, Okuyemi (2014) Secondary analysis of RCT, NRT, self-help guide, counseling N=427, mean age 44, 25% female, 35% white, homeless adult daily smokers interested in quitting smoking 7-day point prevalence abstinence, biochemically verified (breath CO) Number of drinking days of 30; drinks per drinking day; number of heavy drinking days; number of days cocaine or mj/hash or heroin and any drug Smoking Cessation Positive (alcohol)/Null (drugs)
Smoking abstinence (CO-verified) was associated with fewer drinking days (P = 0.03), fewer drinks consumed on drinking days (P = 0.01), and lower odds of heavy drinking (P = 0.05), but not with differences in the number of days of cocaine, marijuana/hashish, heroin or any drug use
18. Winhusen, Kropp, Theobald, Lewis (2014) Secondary analysis of multisite RCT, SUD treatment with or without smoking cessation treatment, counseling, bupropion, contingency management N=249, baseline demographics reported by follow-up smoking status, continued smoking: N=174, mean age 38, 49% female, 61% white, smoking abstinent: N=75, mean age 36, 37% female, 55% white, adults with cocaine or methamphetamine SUD 7-day point prevalence abstinence, biochemically verified (breath CO) Stimulant abstinence (biochemically verified) Smoking Cessation Positive (cocaine)/Null (methamphetamines)
A significant effect was found for the cocaine-dependent subsample (N=147) in which participants who stopped smoking were abstinent for illicit stimulants an average of 78.2% of the post-smoking-quit weeks (weeks 4–10) relative to 63.6% in participants who continued smoking (χ2(1)=8.55, p<.01, d=0.36). No significant effects were found for the sample as a whole (N=249) or for the methamphetamine-dependent subsample (N=102).
19. Stahre, Toomey, Erickson, Forster, Okuyemi, Ahluwalia (2013) RCT, counseling N=755, mean age 45, 67% female, African American adults 7-day point prevalence abstinence, self-report Prevalence and frequency of past 30-day binge drinking and average daily alcohol consumption Smoking Cessation Positive (short term)/Null (long term)
Individuals who quit smoking within the first 8 weeks of the study reported lower past 30-day binge drinking prevalence at week 8 than those who did not quit during the first 8 weeks (P = .035), but the effect was not sustained at the end of the study (week 26)
20. Campbell, Chi, Sterling, Kohn, Weisner (2009) Prospective cohort N=419, adolescents mean age 16, 34% female, 49% white, recruited when entering SUD treatment Abstinence for previous 6 or 12 months, self-report SU self-report follow-up data validated on subsample at 12 months w/urinalysis, abstinence from drugs and alcohol Smoking Cessation Positive (drugs)/Null (alcohol)
Self-initiated tobacco cessation at 6 months, and at both 6 and 12 months, were related to higher odds of drug abstinence but not alcohol abstinence
21. Myers, Prochaska (2008) RCT, group counseling N=54, adolescents mean age 16, 22% female, 69% white, outpatient SUD treatment in Southern California N/A, investigated impact of smoking cessation intervention Total days of substance use at the 3-and 6-month follow up time points Smoking Cessation Treatment Intervention Positive (short term)/Null (long term)
Participants who received smoking cessation intervention had significantly fewer days of substance use than controls at the 3-months, but not at 6-months follow-up
22. Prochaska, Hall, Tsoh, Eisendrath, Rossi, Redding, Rosen, Meisner, Humfleet, Gorecki (2008) RCT, smoking cessation intervention, computer-based intervention, counseling N=322, depressed smokers in mental health outpatient treatment 7-day point prevalence abstinence, biochemically verified (breath CO) Alcohol, mj, stimulant, opiate use (y/n) between follow-ups Positive (alcohol)/Null (drugs)
Participants who successfully stopped smoking reported less alcohol use than did participants who continued smoking. No difference in drug use
23. Brook, Balka, Ning, Brook (2007) Prospective cohort N=473, adolescents mean age 14, 51% female, 51% black, 49% Puerto Rican Current cigarette smoking, self-report Alcohol dependence, illicit drug dependence, alcohol and illicit drug dependence Smoking Cessation Positive (quitters v. early starters & continuous)
Null (quitters v. late starters)
Early starting continuous smokers more likely than quitters report alcohol dependence (OR 3.72) and illicit drug dependence (3.21). There was no difference between late-starting smokers and quitters
Mixed Impact (negative and null)
24. Fu, Kodl, Willenbring, Nelson, Nugent, Gravely, Joseph (2008) Secondary analysis of RCT, smoking cessation intervention, NRT, counseling (concurrent or delayed smoking cessation treatment) N=459, mean age 40, 30% female, 83% white, adults in alcohol use disorder treatment 7-day point prevalence abstinence, self-report (25% subsample biochemically verified) 6-months alcohol abstinence @ 6, 12, 18 months; time to first alcohol use; black/white differences Smoking Cessation Treatment Intervention For whites: alcohol abstinence outcomes were consistently worse in concurrent group than delayed group, but not for blacks