Table 3.
Logistic regression models predicting the likelihoods of using alcohol and drugs to cope with the Pulse Nightclub shooting among LGB adults N = 307.
Predictor | B | SE (B) | Wald | OR | 95% C.I. [OR] | Model X2 | df | Nagelkerke R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Using alcohol to cope | ||||||||
Age | −0.03* | 0.02** | 2.25 | 0.97 | 0.94, 1.01 | |||
Person of color | −0.39 | 0.33 | 1.45 | 0.68 | 0.36, 1.28 | |||
Lesbian female | −0.67 | 0.36 | 3.45 | 0.51 | 0.25, 1.04 | |||
Bisexual female | −0.35 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.30, 1.67 | |||
Bisexual male | −0.46 | 0.89 | 0.27 | 0.63 | 0.11, 3.65 | |||
LGB community social identification | 0.16 | 0.10 | 2.57 | 1.18 | 0.97, 1.43 | |||
Pulse traumatic stress impact | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.54 | 1.30 | 0.82, 1.56 | |||
Involvement in LGB nightlife since pulse | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 1.12 | 0.79, 1.61 | |||
Perception that LGB peers likely used alcohol to cope with pulse | 2.75 | 0.61 | 20.00*** | 15.60*** | 4.68, 51.98 | |||
59.94*** | 9 | 0.26 | ||||||
Using drugs to cope | ||||||||
Age | −0.04 | 0.03 | 1.55 | 0.96 | 0.90, 1.02 | |||
Person of color | 0.15 | 0.50 | 0.09 | 1.16 | 0.44, 3.09 | |||
Lesbian female | −0.97 | 0.60 | 2.62 | 0.38 | 0.12, 1.23 | |||
Bisexual female | −0.38 | 0.67 | 0.33 | 0.68 | 0.19, 2.52 | |||
Bisexual male | 0.12 | 1.17 | 0.01 | 1.12 | 0.11, 11.12 | |||
LGB community social identification | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 1.08 | 0.77, 1.52 | |||
Pulse traumatic stress impact | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.71 | 1.23 | 0.76, 1.98 | |||
Involvement in LGB nightlife since pulse | 0.32 | 0.30 | 1.13 | 1.37 | 0.77, 2.45 | |||
Perception that LGB peers likely used drugs to cope with pulse | 2.21 | 0.64 | 11.61*** | 9.10*** | 2.56, 32.40 | |||
28.12*** | 9 | 0.21 |
p < 0.05.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.