Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun;135(2):916–926. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040121

Table II.

Localization of sulfurtransferases

No. aa
Localization Prediction
Name Gene ID TP/total PSORT TargetP Exp.
AtStr1 At1g79230 58/379 Mit matrix space (0.814) cTP - 0.666 Mit
microbody (peroxisome) (0.579) mTP - 0.319
AtStr2 At1g16460 48/366 Chl stroma (0.607) cTP - 0.233 Cyt
Cyt (0.450) SP - 0.165
AtStr14 At4g27700 34/237 Chl stroma (0.950) cTP - 0.816 Chl
Chl thylakoid membrane (0.800) mTP - 0.258
AtStr15 At4g35770 63/182 Chl stroma (0.837) cTP - 0.822 Chl
Mit matrix space (0.598) mTP - 0.067
AtStr16 At5g66040 79a/120 Cyt (0.450) SP - 0.136 Chl
Mit matrix space (0.360) mTP - 0.108
AtStr17 At2g17850 28a/150 Nucleus (0.760) SP - 0.136 n.d.
microbody (peroxisome) (0.364) mTP - 0.074
AtStr18 At5g66170 10a/136 Chl stroma (0.889) cTP - 0.237 Cyt
Chl thylakoid membrane (0.555) SP - 0.120

The protein name, gene identification, and the number of amino acids for six selected Str are summarized. PSORT and TargetP were used for the localization prediction, and SignalP V2.0 was used for the cleavage site prediction (http://www.expasy.ch/tools). Numbers in brackets give the certainty of prediction in PSORT; for the TargetP program, the respective probabilities are given; only the two highest scores of both programs are given. The results of the experiments done are summarized. aa, amino acids; Chl/c, chloroplast; Cyt, cytoplasm; exp., experimental; ID, identification; Mit/m, mitochondrial; n.d., not determined; SP, secretory pathway; TP, targeting peptide.

a

The prediction probability of the targeting peptide is low.