Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;2016:3932092. doi: 10.1155/2016/3932092

Table 2.

Comparison of serum Total Oxidant Status, Total Antioxidant Status, and Oxidative Status Index in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass circuit coated with phosphorylcholine Group I versus noncoated Group II at different time points.

   T0 T1 T2 T3 T4
TAS (mmoL of trolox/L, mean ± SD) Group I (n = 18) 0.55 ± 0.12 0.81 ± 0.2 0.81 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.23 0.88 ± 0.2
Group II (n = 14) 0.45 ± 0.17 0.48 ± 0.13 0.5 ± 0.16 0.43 ± 0.13 0.53 ± 0.18
p 0.084 0.003 0.001 0.002 0.001

TOS (mean μmol H2O2/L ± SD) Group I (n = 18) 6.24 ± 1.93 12.5 ± 6.18 12.96 ± 6.34 11.73 ± 6.71 15.29 ± 11.71
Group II (n = 14) 5.77 ± 1.3 4.57 ± 1.76 4.85 ± 1.90 4.01 ± 1.55 3.14 ± 1.16
p 0.621 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.001

OSI (mean ± SD) Group I (n = 18) 12.1 ± 5.45 17.11 ± 10.83 19.09 ± 12.51 21.09 ± 17.23 18.01 ± 14.23
Group II (n = 14) 14.13 ± 4.79 10.09 ± 4.76 11 ± 5.55 10.29 ± 5.49 6.87 ± 4.05
p 0.160 0.119 0.063 0.102 0.048

Continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, as indicated by the shape of the distribution pattern in the Shapiro-Wilk test.

p values for comparisons between Group I and Group II with Mann–Whitney U test. A p value of <0.05 is statistically significant. OSI: Oxidative Stress Index, TAS: Total Antioxidant Status, and TOS: Total Oxidant Status.