Table 3.

Visual Acuity after Traumatic Retinal Detachment.

Author	Number of patients	Initial (preintervention) BCVA	Postintervention BCVA	Comments
Nashed et al. [5]	88	2.3%: ≥20/5016%: >20/800	8%: ≥20/5050%: >20/800	36% of patients who received a retinectomy had a VA of >20/800 after intervention
Ehrlich and Polkinghorne [8]	19	5%: ≥20/5022%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 5%: <20/200 & ≥20/400 69%: <20/400	21%: ≥20/50  5%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 11%: <20/200 & ≥20/400 63%: <20/400	63% had improved VA 21% had worsened VA 16% were stable
Rouberol et al. [9]	50	42%: ≥20/200	38%: ≥20/4080%: ≥20/200
Wang et al. [10]	31	3%: ≥20/509%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 87%: <20/400	28%: ≥20/509%: <20/50 & ≥20/200 3%: <20/200 & ≥20/400 58%: <20/400	These were all pediatric patients Only patients who have both a preintervention and postintervention BCVA are included in this chart 48% has improved VA 45% had worsened VA 6% were stable
Eliott et al. [12]	1	20/30	20/20	Pediatric patients
Sheard et al. [13]	47	Median for scleral buckle patients: 20/120 Median for vitrectomy patients: CF	Median for scleral buckle patients: 20/80Median for vitrectomy patients: CF	These were all pediatric patients
Zhang et al. [14]	9	LP (average)	Between LP and HM	No statistical difference between preintervention and postintervention VA
Lesniak et al. [15]	28	LP (average)	20/4000 (average)	Pediatric patients with open globe injuries