Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;311(4):R676–R688. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00237.2016

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of coronary reactive hyperemia (CRH) between wild type (sEH+/+) and sEH−/− (sEH-null) mice. A: tracing depicting coronary flow changes at baseline (before CRH) and after CRH was induced by 15-s no-flow ischemia in both sEH+/+ (dash line) and sEH−/− (continuous line) mice. Repayment volume (B; P < 0.001) and repayment/debt ratio (C; P = 0.0004) were enhanced in sEH−/− vs. sEH+/+ mice. Repayment duration (D) was increased in sEH−/− vs. sEH+/+, but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.31). Peak hyperemic flow, baseline coronary flow, left-ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and heart rate (HR) were not significantly different between the two groups (data not shown). *P ≤ 0.05 sEH+/+. n = 12 per group.