Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 15;311(3):H713–H724. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00142.2016

Table 1.

Effects of MPG, APO, and l-NAME on basal contractility, relaxation, and MAP duration

LVDP, mmHg +dP/dt, mmHg/s t1/2, ms MAPD90, ms
Control 84.6 ± 7.4 2761.3 ± 238.5 48.8 ± 1.9 51.8 ± 5.8
MPG (n = 8) 92.7 ± 12.3 2560.0 ± 144.8 54.6 ± 2.8 52.5 ± 2.8
Control 88.8 ± 3.3 2696.6 ± 128.3 48.4 ± 0.8 50.6 ± 6.9
APO (n = 6) 90.1 ± 5.6 2686.7 ± 155.9 53.9 ± 2.2 55.8 ± 0.7
Control 96.2 ± 8.0 3340.3 ± 243.5 49.8 ± 3.9 56.0 ± 1.5
l-NAME (n = 9) 97.5 ± 6.0 3389.7 ± 203.4 55.8 ± 5.3 57.0 ± 0.6

Values are means ± SE and were obtained at the end of the stabilization (Control) and at the end of the 10-min period of drug perfusion, prior to ischemia. LVDP, left ventricular developed pressure; +dP/dt, maximal rate of pressure development; t1/2, half relaxation time; MAPD90, monophasic action potential duration at 90% repolarization; MPG, mercaptopropionylglycine; APO, apocynin; l-NAME, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester.