Table 2.
Mediator | a | b | c′ | IE | SE | [95% CI] | ES | κ2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negative Affect | 11.41*** | −.004 | −.23 | −.04 | .09 | [−.23, .13] | .16 | .04 |
Positive Affect | −7.22*** | −.01 | −.31** | .05 | .05 | [−.07, .16] | −.17 | .05 |
Clarity of Emotions | −10.53*** | .02** | −.08 | −.16* | .06 | [−.31, −.06] | .66 | .18 |
Attention to Emotions | 0.87 | −.004 | −.24* | −.004 | .01 | [−.06, .01] | .01 | .005 |
Interpersonal Perceptions | −0.51 | .16** | −.17 | −.08* | .05 | [−.20, −.002] | .32 | .11 |
Note. Diagnostic group (X) is coded dichotomously (HC = 0, SAD = 1). Positive affective empathy (Y) is the z-transformed correlation between targets’ and participants’ self-ratings of affect. a, b, c′ = unstandardized regression coefficients for paths from X to M, M to Y, and X to Y controlling for M, respectively; IE = indirect effect (a*b) of group on positive affective empathy through mediator; SE = bootstrap standard error; CI = bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals; ES = effect size ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (PM = ab/(ab + c′)).
p < .05,
p < .01,
p < .001.