Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Ther. 2016 Oct 19;87:232–242. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.10.005

Table 2.

Mediation of the Effect of Diagnostic Group on Positive Affective Empathy

Mediator a b c′ IE SE [95% CI] ES κ2
Negative Affect 11.41*** −.004 −.23 −.04 .09 [−.23, .13] .16 .04
Positive Affect −7.22*** −.01 −.31** .05 .05 [−.07, .16] −.17 .05
Clarity of Emotions −10.53*** .02** −.08 −.16* .06 [−.31, −.06] .66 .18
Attention to Emotions 0.87 −.004 −.24* −.004 .01 [−.06, .01] .01 .005
Interpersonal Perceptions −0.51 .16** −.17 −.08* .05 [−.20, −.002] .32 .11

Note. Diagnostic group (X) is coded dichotomously (HC = 0, SAD = 1). Positive affective empathy (Y) is the z-transformed correlation between targets’ and participants’ self-ratings of affect. a, b, c′ = unstandardized regression coefficients for paths from X to M, M to Y, and X to Y controlling for M, respectively; IE = indirect effect (a*b) of group on positive affective empathy through mediator; SE = bootstrap standard error; CI = bias corrected bootstrap confidence intervals; ES = effect size ratio of the indirect effect to the total effect (PM = ab/(ab + c′)).

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.