TABLE 3.
Effects of additional training programme in strength and power on the force-velocity performances among elite handball players according to line playing positions.
| Front line | % | Rear line | % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | ||||
| Experimental group | ball-throwing velocity (m · s-1) | 21.7 ± 2.7 | 27.1 ± 1.1†¥ | 25.8 | 22.9 ± 1.7 | 27.1 ± 1.2† | 18.8 |
| 1RM half-back squat (kg) | 268.3 ± 19.8¥ | 316.3 ± 28.8† | 17.5 | 261.2 ± 26.6 | 292.5 ± 33.7† | 11.99 | |
| 1RM bench press (kg) | 109.0 ± 17.3 | 132.0 ± 12.5†ψ | 18.5 | 105.6 ± 4.9 | 126.6 ± 6.9†¥ | 20.1 | |
| 1RM developed neck (kg) | 70.6 ± 5.1¥ | 83.6 ± 5.7† | 18.5 | 71.6 ± 3.1¥ | 83.2 ± 4.9†¥ | 16.21 | |
| 1RM print (kg) | 74.5 ± 5.5 | 86.6 ± 5.5†¥ | 16.5 | 75 ± 4.37 | 86 ± 4.89† | 14.75 | |
| 1RM pull-over (kg) | 68.4 ± 5.9 | 76.4 ± 5.5† | 11.8 | 69.0 ± 5.2 | 78.7 ± 5.9† | 12.87 | |
| Control group | ball-throwing(m · s-1) | 23.1 ± 2.6 | 24.2 ± 3.2¥ | 5.2 | 23.4 ± 2.0 | 25.4 ± 2.3† | 8.71 |
| 1RM half-back squat (kg) | 222.0 ± 19.2 | 236.6 ± 17.9 | 6.7 | 224 ± 15.6 | 239 ± 19.3 | 6.23 | |
| 1RM bench press (kg) | 101.0 ± 2.2 | 111.0 ± 5.5¥ | 9.9 | 104.0 ± 8.4 | 113.0 ± 8.5†¥ | 8.95 | |
| 1RM developed neck (kg) | 59.2 ± 5.0 | 63.0 ± 5.7 | 6.5 | 59.7 ± 4.2 | 62.8 ^ ± 4.6 | 5.29 | |
| 1RM print (kg) | 68.8 ± 3.9 | 72.4 ± 3.8 | 5.3 | 69.1 ± 3.4¥ | 72.8 ± 3.4¥ | 5.41 | |
| 1RM pull-over (kg) | 65.2 ± 2.7 | 67.6 ± 4.3¥ | 3.6 | 62.6 ^ ± 3.6 | 65.1 ^ ± 3.0¥ | 4.17 | |
Note: 1-RM = one repetition maximum; Values are given as mean ± SD;
†
differ significantly between T1 and T2;
ψ
significantly difference between lines;
¥
Significantly difference between experimental and control group.