Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 21;113(42):704–711. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0704

Table 2. Results of logistic regression analysis of relationship between federal state*1 and prevalence of major cardiovascular disease*2.

State Odds ratio*3 95% CI p-value
Schleswig-Holstein 1.34 [1.06; 1.68] 0.01
Hamburg 1.17 [0.86; 1.60] 0.2
Lower Saxony 1.33 [1.12; 1.57] 0.001
Bremen 1.21 [0.77; 1.89] 0.4
North Rhine-Westphalia 1.27 [1.1; 1.48] 0.002
Hesse 1.26 [1.06; 1.5] 0.01
Rhineland-Palatinate 1.48 [1.21; 1.81] < 0.001
Baden-Württemberg 1.00 Reference
Bavaria 1.15 [0.98; 1.34] 0.09
Saarland 0.93 [0.66; 1.31] 0.7
Berlin 1.32 [1.06; 1.63] 0.01
Brandenburg 1.30 [1.06; 1.59] 0.01
Mecklenburg-West Pomerania 1.27 [0.97; 1.67] 0.09
Saxony 1.16 [0.97; 1.39] 0.1
Saxony-Anhalt 1.55 [1.25; 1.92] < 0.001
Thuringia 1.30 [1.04; 1.62] 0.02
West (states of old FRG excl. Berlin) 1.00 Reference
East (states of old GDR incl. Berlin) 1.07 [0.98; 1.16] 0.1

(n = 62 214)

*1 Arranged according to official code number for state

*2 Myocardial infarction, other coronary heart disease, heart failure, or stroke

*3 Adjusted for age, sex, social status, community size, and survey wave

CI, Confidence interval; FRG, Federal Republic of Germany; GDR, German Democratic Republic