Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 23;12(2):99–115. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2016-0325

Table 3. . Comparison of uptake of amphotericin B from targeted (thiolated chitosan and mannose-anchored thiolated chitosan) nanocarriers, unmodified chitosan nanocarriers, AmBisome® and native drug in uninfected macrophages.

Formulations Uptake studies (μg AmB/106 cells)
 
  Uninfected macrophages Sensitive strains-infected macrophages Resistant strains-infected macrophages p-value
AmB
0.4 ± 0.01
0.38 ± 0.02
0.04 ± 0.006
0.058x
0.0002y
0.0003z
AmBisome
1.1 ± 0.07
1.2 ± 0.08
0.3 ± 0.05
0.061x
0.007y
0.0073z
UC
6.5 ± 0.9
6.3 ± 0.7
2.9 ± 0.4
0.055x
0.0004y
0.0003z
TC
12.9 ± 2.3
11.5 ± 1.1
12.3 ± 2.2
0.056x
0.071y
0.069z
MTC
28.6 ± 1.4 †***,‡**,§*,¶*
27.9 ± 1.6 †***,‡**,§**,¶*
28.1 ± 1.7†***,‡**,§**,¶*
0.059x
0.063y
0.064z
Pretreatment with verapamil
AmB
0.39 ± 0.02
0.36 ± 0.03
0.084 ± 0.01
0.061x
0.003y
0.004z
AmBisome
1.2 ± 0.06
1.3 ± 0.09
0.76 ± 0.05
0.079x
0.009y
0.008z
UC 6.6 ± 0.8 6.2 ± 0.5 3.5 ± 0.9 0.062x
0.004y
0.003z

Both resistant and sensitive Leishmania donovani were used to infect macrophages. Data are expressed as three replicates in all tests, and the data are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences of MTC were determined in relation to AmB solution (), AmBisome (), UC (§) and TC () at significance levels of * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. x = probability value between uninfected macrophage group and sensitive strain-infected macrophage group; y = probability value between uninfected macrophage group and resistant strain-infected macrophage group; z = probability value between sensitive strain-infected macrophage group and resistant strain-infected macrophage group.

AmB: Amphotericin B; MTC: Mannose-anchored thiolated chitosan; SD: Standard deviation; TC: Thiolated chitosan; UC: Unmodified chitosan.