Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 10;21(45):30393. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.45.30393

Table 4. Incidence of pertussis in household contacts by characteristic, Catalonia and Navarre, Spain, 2012–13 (n = 2,852).

Characteristic of household contact Incidence of pertussis
among contacts
Odds ratio 95% CI
% n/total
Sex
Female 15.9 241/1,512 1.0 0.8 to 1.2
Male 16.3 218/1,340 Reference
Age in years
< 1 69.3 104/150 24.6 16.2 to 37.4
1 44.8 26/58 8.8 5.0 to 15.6
2–3 25.0 33/132 3.6 2.3 to 5.7
4–6 21.5 43/200 3.0 2.0 to 4.5
7–10 19.5 43/221 2.6 1.7 to 3.9
11–18 19.1 40/209 2.6 1.7 to 3.9
19–40 9.6 93/967 1.2 0.8 to 1.6
> 40 8.4 77/915 Reference
Household contacts
Cohabitants 16.5 336/2034 1.1 0.9 to 1.4
Non-cohabitants 15.0 123/818 Reference
Relationship with primary case
Mother 8.3 46/556 1.8 1.0 to 3.4
Father 8.8 45/510 2.0 1.1 to 3.7
Sibling 25.7 133/518 7.2 4.2 to 12.6
Grandparent 4.5 15/330 Reference
Child 61.2 85/139 33.0 17.7 to 61.5
Partner 16.0 16/100 4.0 1.9 to 8.4
Othera 17.0 119/699 4.3 2.5 to 7.5
Vaccination statusb (≤ 18 years)
Fully vaccinated 23.8 138/581 0.11 0.07 to 0.17
Undervaccinated 52.9 64/121 0.38 0.22 to 0.68
Unvaccinated 74.5 76/102 Reference
Received chemoprophylaxisc
Yes 9.9 226/2,284 0.47 0.35 to 0.62
No 19.0 77/406 Reference

CI: confidence interval.

a Caregiver, family friend or neighbour.

b Vaccination status was categorised as fully vaccinated (≥ 4 doses of vaccine), undervaccinated (< 4 doses) or unvaccinated (no dose).

c Azithromycin was used.