Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 8;11(12):e0167818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167818

Table 3. Associations between LAC and cognitive testing performances at t1.

r p Rank (i) (i/m)Q
CGn = 31 RTreading (sec) -.169 .364 16 0.089
RTnaming (sec) -.086 .646 30 0.167
Stroop (sec) -.151 .419 19 0.106
TMT-L A (sec) -.11 .554 26 0.144
TMT-L B (sec) -.106 .571 28 0.156
primacy words (f) .082 .659 31 0.172
middle words (f) -.172 .356 15 0.083
recency words (f) -.28 .128 3 0.017
words total (f) -.178 .339 13 0.072
LIn = 30 RTreading (sec) .038 .84 36 0.200
RTnaming (sec) -.145 .444 20 0.111
Stroop (sec) .047 .805 34 0.189
TMT-L A (sec) .247 .189 8 0.044
TMT-L B (sec) .215 .253 10 0.056
primacy words (f) -.392 .032 1 0.006
middle words (f) .126 .507 25 0.139
recency words (f) -.206 .275 11 0.061
words total (f) -.142 .455 21 0.117
MIn = 30 RTreading (sec) .132 .493 24 0.133
RTnaming (sec) .175 .346 14 0.078
Stroop (sec) .338 .073 2 0.011
TMT-L A (sec) .113 .558 27 0.150
TMT-L B (sec) .107 .581 29 0.161
primacy words (f) .289 .129 4 0.022
middle words (f) -.158 .412 18 0.100
recency words (f) -.054 .782 33 0.183
words total (f) -.045 .819 35 0.194
HIn = 30 RTreading (sec) .24 .202 9 0.050
RTnaming (sec) .17 .37 17 0.094
Stroop (sec) -.075 .692 32 0.178
TMT-L A (sec) .136 .474 23 0.128
TMT-L B (sec) .196 .299 12 0.067
primacy words (f) -.253 .178 7 0.039
middle words (f) -.139 .464 22 0.122
recency words (f) -.267 .154 6 0.033
words total (f) -.283 .130 5 0.028

LAC = whole blood lactate concentration; t1 = assessment after intervention, Rank = rank of p-values ordered from smallest to largest; m = number of tests; (i/m)Q = Benjamini-Hochberg critical value; CG = control group, LI = low intensity group, MI = moderate intensity group, HI = high intensity group