Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: Immunity. 2016 Oct 18;45(4):719–736. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.10.010

Table 2.

Comparison of Cre strains for conditional deletion of genes in dendritic cells

Strain Cells Affected Caveats
Itgax-cre (BAC) (Caton et al., 2007) ~100% of cDCs, pDCs, alveolar macrophages, ~70% red pulp macrophages, 20–40% monocytes, marginal zone macrophages, peritoneal macrophages, ~5–12% T, B, NK cells Germline deletion possible
Itgax-cre (Transgene) (Stranges et al., 2007) cDCs, pDCs Deletion in other cell types was not analyzed, most likely similar to other Itgax- cre strain
Clec9a-cre (Schraml et al., 2013) ~100% of cDC1s, ~50% of cDC2s, ~20% of pDCs Begins deletion at CDP stage, low or transient expression may affect deletion efficiency in cDC2s and pDCs
Zbtb46-cre (Loschko et al., 2016b) 65–95% cDCs, <10% in all other cell types Deletion efficiency variable depending on floxed allele
Cd207-cre (Zahner et al., 2011) Langerhans cells, Langerin+ cDC1s in dermis, skin-draining LNs, and lung
Xcr1-cre (Ohta et al., 2016) cDC1s
Siglech-cre (Puttur et al., 2013) ~30% of pDCs, ~2% of other lymphoid cells Incomplete deletion in pDCs
Deletion in marginal zone macrophages untested but possible