Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2017 Jan;55(1):31–36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000599

Table 4.

Association between vena cava filter use and cancer site (N=13,104)

Cancer site Total N % using VCF aORa 95% CI
Oral 146 8.2% 0.67 0.35 1.30
Skin 180 13.9% 1.06 0.66 1.73
Bone/soft tissue 167 11.4% 0.90 0.52 1.56
Stomach/small intestine 313 16.3% 1.17 0.80 1.70
Colorectal 1,392 16.2% 1.25 0.99 1.57
Liver 217 9.2% 0.85 0.50 1.45
Pancreas 796 11.2% 0.76 0.57 1.03
Lung/larynx/pleura 3,931 11.4% 1.02 0.83 1.25
Breast 776 7.6% 0.65 0.47 0.91
Uterus 312 15.1% 1.02 0.69 1.49
Cervix 165 17.0% 1.37 0.84 2.22
Ovarian 468 14.7% 1.13 0.81 1.58
Prostate 613 14.2% 0.98 0.72 1.32
Testicular 61 13.1% 1.62 0.66 3.95
Bladder 360 15.6% 1.12 0.79 1.58
Kidney 476 11.3% 1.09 0.76 1.55
Brain 308 24.4% 2.31 1.65 3.23
Thyroid 44 18.2% 1.22 0.46 3.24
Myeloma 378 12.2% 0.96 0.66 1.39
Leukemia 766 7.0% 0.64 0.46 0.90
Lymphoma 293 7.2% 0.76 0.46 1.26
Endocrine 121 14.0% 0.92 0.31 2.75
Metastatic 7,046 13.6% 1.13 1.00 1.29
a

Cancer-specific regression model included all covariates from the primary model. Results for those variables were not meaningfully different and are excluded here for brevity.

Abbreviations: aOR=adjusted odds ratio; CI=confidence interval; VCF=vena cava filter