Table 2.

Results of the ANOVAs.

	df, ε	F	p	${\eta }_p^2$
COPY TYPING
Typing style	1, 291	48.4	<0.001	0.14
Sources of information	4, 1164, ε = 0.09	274	<0.001	0.49
Typing style * sources of information	4, 1164, ε = 0.09	45	<0.001	0.13
FREE TYPING
Typing style	1, 291	38.1	<0.001	0.12
Sources of information	3, 873, ε = 0.91	203	<0.001	0.42
Typing style * sources of information	3, 873, ε = 0.91	49	<0.001	0.14
COPY TYPING VS. FREE TYPING
Typing style	1, 291	58.9	<0.001	0.97
Typing task	1, 291	32.1	<0.001	0.099
Sources of information	3, 873, ε = 0.9	232	<0.001	0.45
Typing style * typing task	1, 291	13.3	<0.001	0.044
Typing style * sources of information	3, 873, ε = 0.9	52	<0.001	0.15
Typing task * sources of information	3, 873, ε = 0.93	3.67	0.014	0.012
Typing task * typing style * sources of information	3, 873, ε = 0.93	9.75	<0.001	0.032
ERROR DETECTION
Typing style	1, 291	0.24	0.62	0.001
Sources of information	4, 1164, ε = 0.85	217	<0.001	0.43
Typing style * sources of information	4, 1164, ε = 0.85	28.4	<0.001	0.089

The first two ANOVAs were performed with the factors typing style and sources of information on the reported extent of attention in copy typing and in free typing. The third ANOVA with the factors typing style, typing task, and sources of information was performed on the reported extent of attention. The fourth ANOVA with the factors typing style and sources of information was performed on the use of cues in error detection.